Canada mass school shooting: How often does this happen?

Canada, unlike United State, recorded only three mass shootings between 2000 and 2014. 

Joshua Mercredi/The Canadian Press via AP
The outside of La Loche Community School is shown. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the shootings occurred at a high school and another location but did not say where else. School shootings are rare in Canada. The grade 7 through 12 La Loche Community School is in the remote aboriginal community of La Loche, Saskatchewan

Shootings at schools or universities are rare in Canada, making the Friday incident in Saskatchewan the worst shooting to have happened in a decade, according to the Associated Press.

Canada recorded only three mass shootings between 2000 and 2014, the Wall Street Journal reports. That same study, by researchers Jaclyn Schildkraut of the State University of New York in Oswego and H. Jaymi Elsass of Texas State University, tallied 133 mass shootings in the US. 

Canada continues to mourn the high school shooting by a single gunman in northern Saskatchewan, Canada, that left at least four dead, and two injured. The suspected shooter is in police custody. But it's unclear whether this shooting will renew a debate over the country’s gun laws.

Canadian gun laws are stricter compared to the US, and unlike the Second Amendment of the United States, the Canadian constitution does not provide protection for the right bear arms.

Is there a correlation between the relatively few mass shootings in Canada and the strict gun laws?

There's a complex debate around this question which continues to rage around the world. The National Observer reports that “roughly 300 million firearms in the U.S. according to some estimates, nearly one per person in a country of 319 million people. By contrast, Canada had approximately seven million registered firearms at the end of 2011, in a country of roughly 35 million people.”

According to a 2012 Statistics Canada report, Canada recorded a total of 172 firearm related homicides compared to the 8,813 firearm related homicides in the United States.

But gun-control critics point to a decline in US gun homicides even as gun ownership has risen

Most observers say Canadian gun laws in recent years have been shaped by the worst mass shooting in Canada, which occurred more than 25 years ago, on Dec. 6, 1989. That's when Marc Lépine shot and killed 14 female students with a semiautomatic rifle at the Université de Montréal’s engineering school.The tragedy prompted the government to introduce stricter gun laws, which was loosened for rifles by the conservative government in 2012, citing costs.

During the recent election, Justin Trudeau's Liberal Party proposed a new set of measures that would tighten the Canadian gun laws. The measures include requiring enhanced background checks for anyone seeking to purchase a handgun or other restricted firearm, repealing changes made by Bill C-42 that allowed restricted and prohibited weapons to be freely transported without a permit and to tighten border security that would prevent illegal arms from entering Canada from the United States.

Firearms are classified into three categories under the Canadian constitution; prohibited, restricted and unrestricted. Prohibited firearms include military-grade assault weapons such as AK-47s and sawn-off rifles or shotguns. Restricted firearms include all handguns that do not fall under the "prohibited" class, as well as semi-automatic weapons with barrels shorter than 47 cm (18.5 inches) while rifles and shotguns are classified as non-restricted.

Under Canadian law, individuals are required to hold a license from the federal government, to purchase and possess a firearm. The license lasts five years and requires an individual to pass a gun safety course. Individuals who wish to possess restricted and prohibited firearms must take additional safety government courses.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.