Can Rwanda become a high-tech hub with an authoritarian leader?

Rwanda under President Paul Kagame has invested in infrastructure, drawing start-ups and outside investments. But will a referendum to extend his power squelch the potential for further progress?

AP
Rwanda President Paul Kagame posts his ballot, in Kigali, Friday, Dec. 18, 2015. Rwandans are voting in a referendum to decide if President Kagame should be allowed to extend his time in power. Kagame is ineligible to run in 2017 because the Rwandan constitution limits a president to two terms. But if Rwandans vote to change the term restriction, Kagame would be able to run for an additional seven-year term and then two-five terms. He could possibly stay in power until 2034.

Rwandans headed to the polls on Friday to vote on a referendum that would change the country’s new constitution, allowing its current president to stay in office for nearly 20 more years. 

President Paul Kagame, who some credit with ending the country’s civil war, is facing the end of his second term in 2017, though the vote could potentially allow him to remain in power until 2034.

“I did not apply for this. You go and ask Rwandans why they want me," said Mr. Kagame, who has run the country since 2000, to Agence France-Presse.

The measure has been criticized as undemocratic by the United States and Europe. Some have condemned the referendum as a foregone conclusion, in a country known for government intimidation.

The referendum was hastily announced just last week, and the country’s Green Party says it did not have time to organize a counter campaign, AFP reported.

In the spring of 1994, an estimated 500,000 to 1,000,000 Rwandans, mostly ethnic Tutsis, were killed over a 100-day period by members of the Hutu majority. Kagame’s rebel Tutsi group, the Rwanda Patriotic Front, ended the genocide with a military victory over government forces.

By 2000, Kagame was elected president, unleashing a plan to pour money into infrastructure and create a self-sustaining economic model for its citizens.

Billions flowed into the country from Western nations and the number of people living below the poverty line fell. Education and healthcare improved, and by 2014 new construction and signs of economic prosperity could be seen on the streets of Kigali, the country's capital.

In recent years, Rwanda has installed thousands of miles of fiber optic cables and improved its cell-phone network and now has one of the faster Internet connections in the region, according to The Washington Post, with a plan to provide high-speed Internet access to nearly all of the country by 2017.

The goal is to bring investors and entrepreneurs from the tech industry to the country, a way to combat poverty and rebuild the area still recovering from the war, government officials said.

But as Kagame has drawn fire for targeting political opponents, squelching press freedoms, and edging Rwanda closer to authoritarian rule, donors have pulled back aid, the Post said.

But while outside funding continued to represent half of Rwanda’s budget in 2014, new urgency has been given to the high-tech plan.

The government and private investors last year began a $100 million venture fund to produce 100 indigenous, high-tech companies worth $50 million.

“It reinforces our desire to one day not be able to depend on aid,” Clare Akamanzi, chief operating officer for the Rwanda Development Board, told the Post. “Technology is a key. We call it the driver for other economic activity.”

Over 90 percent of Rwanda’s workforce is tied to subsistence farming, according to the World Bank, even as the country has sustained 7 percent growth.

Kagame’s move to change the constitution to potentially retain power is just the latest of similar gambits across the African continent in countries like Congo and Burundi.

The referendum proposes keeping a two-term limit and reducing presidential terms from seven to five years, but makes an exception for Kagame, allowing him to stay in office through 2034, The Wall Street Journal reported.

“Very few Rwandans are willing or able to challenge President Kagame or the ruling party,” Carina Tertsakian, a researcher for Rwanda and Burundi at Human Rights Watch, told the Journal.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Can Rwanda become a high-tech hub with an authoritarian leader?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2015/1218/Can-Rwanda-become-a-high-tech-hub-with-an-authoritarian-leader
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe