Taiwan and China: a handshake more symbolic than constructive?

The meeting between China and Taiwan was a seemingly progressive step between the two countries. But how much progress actually came out of it? 

Chinese President Xi Jinping and Taiwan's President Ma Ying-jeou (L) wave to the media during a summit in Singapore November 7, 2015. Leaders of political rivals China and Taiwan met on Saturday for the first time in more than 60 years for talks that come amid rising anti-Beijing sentiment on the self-ruled democratic island and weeks ahead of elections there.

Chinese President Xi Jinping and Ma Ying-jeou, the President “of the Republic of China,” also known as Taiwan, had a monumental meeting in Singapore last Saturday. It was the first time leaders of the two countries met in over six decades, and it comes following a series of brewing peace talks.

And during the talk, a quiet "war" was brewing on an unlikely platform: support for Taiwan's opposition leader Tsai Ing-wen was surging on Facebook with over 70,000 posts during the talks. Dr. Tsai is the front-runner in Taiwan's current presidential race, which will come to a head this January.

The handshake between Mr. Xi and Mr. Ma was a historical moment – and a hopeful step towards a much-anticipated peace between the two neighbors. The last time such a high-level meeting took place was in Chongquing in 1945 to celebrate Japan’s downfall in World War II. But after Mao and the Communists took control of the country in 1949, Chiang Kai-shek and the nationalist army fled to Taiwan. 

But this year's meeting turned out to be more symbolic than anything else. 

The most concrete proposal came with Ma’s suggestion to set up a hotline for both sides for emergencies. The rest was mutual flattery.

“History will remember today,” Mr. Xi said, calling China and Taiwan “one family with blood that is thicker than water.”

“We are seated together here today so that the tragedies of history will not be repeated, so that the gains from peaceful development across the strait will not be won and again lost, so that compatriots on both sides of the strait continue making peaceful and tranquil lives, and so that succeeding generations can share a beautiful future.” 

China, however, did not acknowledge Taiwan’s potential independence, and still views Taiwan as a lost colony that someday will reunite with mainland China. China and Taiwan have grown closer since Ma’s presidency, with over 20 signed trade agreements. Many, however, fear an economic partnership will disrupt Taiwan’s democracy.

It was also a chance for Mr. Xi to construct a more peaceful image in the public eye after being repeatedly cited as a growing aggressor in Asia.

The meeting took place in Singapore, but back home in Taiwan, citizens were less than happy to see the leaders get together. At least 100 protestors attempted to break through the parliament building in Taipei with “Taiwan independence” banners. The police stopped them but no arrests were made.

The talk comes at a time when Taiwan is about to see a new 2016 presidential election, where support is growing for Tsai, a liberal female leader of the Democratic Progressive party. In prior years, and much to the disdain of China's leaders, Tsai's party has called for independence from China. Support for the Democratic Progressives surged during the protests, and her Facebook page had over 70,000 posts during the meeting between Xi and Ma – a uniquely recalcitrant platform for Taiwan's democracy, because Facebook is banned in China. 

“I hope this rare new experience can let the ‘new friend’ see a more complete democracy, freedom and pluralism of Taiwan,” Tsai posted to contributors “from across the Strait,” the strip of water separating the mainland and Taiwan. “Welcome to the world of Facebook!”

Her message can be perceived as a stab at China's lack of press freedom – and Taiwan's celebrated press freedom. Separated by a small strait, the contrast between the two countries' press outlets could not be more stark: during the meeting, China's President read from a lengthy statement and allowed three hand-selected questions while Ma opened the floor for questions.   

Chinese leaders have long called out Tsai's party's radical independent stance, and say they will do anything necessary – including taking Taiwan "by force" – if the party tries to move towards independence.

But whether this will happen will be left to the 18 million Taiwanese who will be voting this coming January.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Taiwan and China: a handshake more symbolic than constructive?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today