Is India souring on Modi?

Narendra Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party suffered a serious defeat in the northern Indian state of Bihar, a vote that many view as a referendum on the prime minister's nationalist policies.

Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar defeated Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ruling Hindu nationalist party in a crucial election in one of India's most populous states.

After sweeping into power in 2014, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his party may now be losing popularity, as his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) suffered a significant state election loss on Sunday.

Modi conceded defeat to Nitish Kumar of the Janata Dal United party, after early tallies showed Mr. Kumar leading 180 to 63 in Bihar, the country’s third largest state.

Modi did not run in the election, but as the BJP's leader he campaigned heavily in the state over the last several months on promises of economic reform and by stirring nationalist and religious sentiments – the same tactics that helped gain him power just 18 months earlier.

But by late afternoon it became clear those efforts were in vain, and Modi posted a congratulatory message on his Twitter feed.

During his tenure as Bihar's chief minister for most of the last 12 years, Kumar has gained his own reputation for economic development in Bihar, one of India's poorest states, where about 30 percent of the state's 100 million residents live on less than $2 a day.

Modi won BJP’s largest parliamentary majority in 2014 with promises of drastic economic change, but his loss on Sunday could be a sign that the prime minister’s power may already be slipping.

"This is a clear indication that Modi's popularity may now have peaked," political analyst Satish Misra, of Observer Research Foundation, told Reuters.

In many ways, Modi staked his name on Bihar’s elections, often touring India’s northeastern state and attending more than two-dozen rallies in support of the BJP since August.

His party’s defeat may signify a shift away from Modi’s politics that many have condemned for using religion and the caste system to stir up nationalist feelings. Modi’s loss is a referendum against Hindu-centric policies bordering on racism, critics say. About 20 percent of Bihar’s population is Muslim.

Kumar’s victory may also be an indication of more ubiquitous political troubles that could have far-reaching economic results.

“Modi must keep his members in check or risk losing domestic and global credibility,” a representative of Moody’s Analytics said to Reuters.  

The defeat could also make passage of Modi’s economic policies and tax reform proposals more challenging. BJP holds a minority in the Indian Parliament’s Upper House, and its members are elected by state legislatures. This arrangement leaves the possibility that Modi’s other political adversaries could follow Kumar’s lead, The Wall Street Journal reports. Five state elections are set for 2017 in regions where Modi’s party has had weak showing, according to Reuters.

“You could see a movement toward new political alignments in the opposition,” said E. Sridharan, academic director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for the Advanced Study of India, to Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Is India souring on Modi?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today