Where are the world's most endangered monuments?

The World Monuments Fund releases its 2016 'Watch List' to raise awareness of preservation needs around the globe.

Ann Hermes/The Christian Science Monitor/File
The interior of the Heneine Palace, once home to 'Dr. Dahesh,' a Lebanese mystic, artist, and philosopher, now houses squatters in one of Beirut’s conservation areas, Nov. 16, 2012, in Beirut, Lebanon.

Today the World Monuments Fund announced its 2016 list of culturally significant sites at risk from environmental degradation, urbanization, and social or political turmoil.

The Watch List, as it is known, is an advocacy tool used to raise "worldwide concern" about the WMF’s preservation efforts around the globe.

"The 2016 Watch includes many extraordinary places that deserve to be celebrated because they represent high moments of human culture," said Bonnie Burnham, WMF president and CEO. "WMF looks forward to working with the local experts, organizations, and government agencies who have nominated these sites. We hope our endorsement will advance their goals to save each of these cherished places."

The 2014 Watch List included 67 sites in 41 countries and territories, including the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, under threat from corrosion, and the city of Venice, which has been dealing with high waters and flooding for generations.

For the updated list, some new monuments were added and others removed, resulting in a list of 50 sites in 36 countries, including: all of Nepal's cultural heritage sites, destroyed by a devastating earthquake; an ancient, underwater city, threatened by pollution and cruise ships (Pavlopetri, Greece); a medieval Swahili town at risk from looters and a harsh climate (Kua Ruins, Tanzania); a "modern engineering masterpiece on the verge of being dismantled" (Shukhov Tower, Russia); and dozens more.

The WMF also added the "Unnamed Monument ... in recognition of the deliberate and calculated damage to thousands of cultural heritage sites in many areas of political and social instability."

Throughout war zones in the Middle East, the WMF has worked with conservation professionals to identify historically and culturally significant sites for preservation.

In Syria, the WMF partnered with a local conservation agency to unearth seven different conservation projects at the Citadel of Aleppo, a city whose history dates back to the Bronze Age. The Citadel and other sites like it have been threatened or destroyed by Syria's civil war, which erupted in 2011.   

The new list also includes known and as-yet undiscovered World War II concentration camps in Italy "to bring attention to this vanishing piece of history and the need for further research to uncover the remaining sites."

It also recognizes the Buddhist and Hindu heritage sites that were destroyed in the aftermath of the 2015 earthquake in Nepal, "[to honor] the resilience of the Nepalese people, while bringing attention to the need for sustained international [preservation] efforts."

Inclusion on their Watch List does not guarantee funding or an influx of better preservation methods, cautions the WMF, but the recognition can help fundraising efforts. Since the Watch List’s founding in 1996, sites have raised approximately $240 million for conservation, and the WMF has donated an additional $100 million to select sites.

American Express, the founding sponsor of the World Monuments Watch, has given $16.5 million to 160 projects in 70 countries, says WMF.

"The World Monuments Watch is the most important call-to-action for the preservation of at-risk historical sites across the world," said Timothy J. McClimon, president of the American Express Foundation. "For two decades, the Watch has been a driving force in securing funding and engaging local communities to preserve these endangered cultural treasures."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Where are the world's most endangered monuments?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today