Missing plane highlights Indonesia's aviation safety problems

The wreckage of an Indonesian airplane that went missing Sunday was spotted Monday. The crash has once more raised concerns over the Indonesian aviation industry’s safety standards.

AP Photo/File
Trigana Air Service's ATR42-300 twin turboprop plane takes off at Supadio airport in Pontianak, West Kalimantan, Indonesia on Dec. 26, 2010. The same type of a Trigana airliner carrying 54 people was missing Sunday, Aug. 16, 2015 after losing contact with ground control during a short flight in bad weather in the country's mountainous easternmost province of Papua, officials said. A search for the plane was suspended and will resume Monday morning.

An Indonesian aircraft carrying 54 people went missing on Sunday over the country’s remote and mountainous province of Papua, officials say.

[Update Monday: Smoldering wreckage of the Trigana Air Service turboprop plane was spotted from the air Monday morning in a rugged area of the easternmost province of Papua, rescue officials said. There was no immediate word if there were any survivors.]

 A Trigana Air Service plane lost contact in the afternoon during a 42-minute flight from the provincial capital, Jayapura, to the city of Oksibil in Papua, the country’s largest and easternmost region, Transportation Ministry spokesman Julius Barata told the Associated Press. The ATR42-300 twin turboprop plane, which was carrying 49 passengers and five crew members, made no distress calls, Mr. Barata said.

Villagers from Oksibil have reported that an aircraft had crashed in the area, and Operation Director Beni Sumaryanto said search teams would check the region Monday morning, according to Reuters.

The missing aircraft sparks a fresh wave of concern over Indonesia’s booming aviation sector, which has met criticism over safety standards and corruption in the face of a woeful safety record. As the AP reports:

After Indonesia deregulated its aviation industry in the 1990s, dozens of airlines emerged making air travel affordable for the first time for many in the world's fourth most populous nation. But accidents in recent years have raised urgent questions about the safety of Indonesia's booming airline sector, with experts saying poor maintenance, rule-bending, and a shortage of trained professionals are partly to blame.

In the last decade, the fatality rate in plane crashes in Indonesia was one per million passengers, or 25 times that of the United States, Arnold Barnett, a statistician at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who specializes in airline safety, told The New York Times in December, following the fatal crash in the Java Sea of an AirAsia flight to Singapore.

“To assert that the disparity is only a coincidence or manifestation of bad luck would be preposterous,” Mr. Barnett said.

Indonesia’s transportation ministry in January announced harsh measures against the aviation sector, including the examination of routing permits for all airlines operating in the country. But the missing Trigana flight is already the second aircraft-related incident that made headlines since the start of the crackdown: At the end of June, a military plane crashed in Medan, Indonesia’s third largest city, killing at least 55.

Trigana Air officials said Sunday’s flight left Sentani Airport in Jayapura at 2:22 p.m. and was scheduled to land in Oksibil at about 3:16 p.m. The plane lost contact at about 2:55 p.m., Indonesia’s Mr. Barata told CNN.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.