Why India is cracking down on Internet pornography

The Indian government has blocked more than 800 websites in a move that has renewed nationwide debate around freedom of speech.

Rajesh Kumar Singh/AP Photo
A stray dog sleeps outside as an Indian man use the internet at a cyber cafe in Allahabad, India, Monday, Aug.3, 2015. India has ordered Internet service providers to block access to more than 850 adult websites in what the government has described as a way to protect social decency.

India has attempted to stamp out Internet pornography – at least for a while.

The government has asked Internet Service Providers (ISPs) in the country to block more than 800 pornographic websites as part of an effort to prevent them from “spreading anti-social activities,” The Hindustan Times reports. The decision, which ISPs enacted Sunday, has renewed debate around freedom of speech and censorship in India, the world’s largest democracy.

“Free and open access to porn websites has been brought under check,” N.N. Kaul, a department of telecommunications spokesman, told Reuters. “We don't want them to become a social nuisance.”

In a 17-page order issued to ISPs July 31, the government ordered 857 websites to be blocked “on grounds of morality and decency” under the 2008 Information Technology Act.

The ban comes after the Indian Supreme Court last month ruled against the outright prohibition of Internet porn, HuffPost India reports. The court, responding to a petition arguing that porn access fueled crimes against women, said such a ban would violate constitutionally protected personal freedoms – but acknowledged the need for greater control over porn websites especially in terms of children’s access to them. The case is still ongoing.

Over the weekend, Internet users across India reported that some adult websites had been replaced with blank white pages, according to The Verge. Others reported seeing a government message saying the site had been blocked.

Government officials have said that they enacted this weekend’s porn ban to prevent children from accessing the sites. “Adults will still be able to access the sites using virtual private networks (VPNs) or proxy servers,” the BBC reports.

“There is no total ban. This was done in the backdrop of Supreme Court's observation on children having free access to porn sites. The idea is also to protect India's cultural fabric. This will not prevent adults from visiting porn sites,” a senior official who declined to be named told the network.

“It is a temporary arrangement” until the government can come up with a long-term control policy, he added.

The ban sparked outrage from social media users, who were quick to start the hashtag #PornBan on Twitter.

“There is no proper justification that [the government has] given for banning all porn, rather than child porn or revenge porn or something like that,” Pranesh Prakash, policy director at the Centre for Internet and Society in Bangalore, told The Financial Times. “The reaction is heavy handed, and has been done under the cloak of secrecy.”

It’s not the first time that Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration has been accused of curbing freedom of speech. In February, the government pushed for greater Internet restrictions and opposed the removal of a provision of the Information Technology Act that called for imprisoning people who sent “offensive” messages by computer or cellphone.

The Supreme Court later struck down the provision, known as Section 66A, in a decision that advocates lauded as a victory for free speech, The Christian Science Monitor reported.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.