Beijing wins 2022 Winter Olympics vote

The International Olympic Committee picked the Chinese capital to host the Winter Olympics in seven years, making it the first city to win both Summer and Winter Games.

Olivia Harris/Reuters
Members of the Beijing delegation celebrate after Beijing was awarded the 2022 Winter Olympic Games, defeating Almaty in the final round of voting, during the 128th IOC session in Kuala Lumpur, July 31, 2015.

Beijing was awarded the 2022 Winter Olympics on Friday, capitalizing on its previous 2008 Summer Games experience and defying concerns about its air quality and lack of natural snow.

This makes the Chinese capital the first city to host both Summer and Winter Olympics.

“Just as with the Beijing 2008 Summer Games, the Olympic family has put its faith in Beijing again to deliver the athlete-centered, sustainable and economical Games we have promised,” the Beijing bid committee said in a statement. “This will be a memorable event at the foot of the Great Wall for the whole Olympic family, the athletes and the spectators that will further enhance the tremendous potential to grow winter sports in our country, in Asia and around the world.”

Kazakhstan narrowly missed becoming the first Central Asian country to host an Olympics, despite its winter and nature credentials – waist-deep snow, snow-capped mountains and lush forests.

Beijing defeated Almaty, 44-40, in a secret ballot during meetings of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Oslo, Norway dropped out of the bidding process last year, citing worries over costs and the lack of popular support, leaving just Beijing and the Kazakhstan capital. Other cities that dropped out of the race early included Stockholm, Sweden; Munich, Germany; Davos/St. Moritz, Switzerland; and Krakow, Poland. 

The Beijing 2022 Winter Olympics will mark a third consecutive Olympics in an Asian nation, following the 2018 Winter Games in Pyeongchang, South Korea and the 2020 Summer Games in Tokyo, Japan. 

As China drummed up support at home to host the games, activists groups called on the IOC to reject the Chinese bid, saying that China’s human rights record actually worsened as a result of the 2008 Summer Games in Beijing.

Beijing had also been on the defensive in the final days of the campaign in the face of mounting concerns over toxic air pollution and snow conditions.

Beijing’s Mayor Wang Anshun gave IOC delegates assurances that major steps had been taken since his city hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics, with a series of coal power plants closed to bring back the city's blue skies and white clouds. “All our efforts are moving Beijing towards a clean-energy future,” Mr. Wang said.

The 2022 Beijing Winter games, which will rely extensively on man-made snow, "will be split between three Olympic sites: one in the city of Zhangjiakou, 125 miles from Beijing in the Hebei province; another in Yanqing, a mountainous region to Beijing’s north-west; and a third in China’s sprawling capital itself," The Guardian reports

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.