Former NBA player kicked out of Filipino league for insulting Manny Pacquiao: Was the decision fair?

Comments against the celebrated boxer and the Philippine Basketball Association led to former NBA first-round draft pick Daniel Orton getting fined by the league and fired by the team he was playing for.

Rob Latour/Invision/AP/File
Manny Pacquiao attends the Los Angeles Premiere of "Manny" at the TCL Chinese Theatre on Tuesday, Jan 20, in Los Angeles. The eight-division boxing champ is known for involving himself in a number of industries, including film, music, politics, and pro basketball, in the Philippines.

You don’t mess with Manny Pacquiao.

That appears to be the message that the Philippine Basketball Association was sending when it sanctioned former NBA player Daniel Orton after he criticized the celebrated Filipino boxer’s skills on the court.

“Professional boxer, okay. Congressman, all right. Professional basketball player? No. It’s a joke. Seriously, it’s a joke,” Mr. Orton said last week, according to Agence France Presse.

At the time, Orton’s team, the Purefoods Star Hotshots, had just lost to the Kia [Motors] Carnival, where Mr. Pacquiao, a third-term congressman in the Philippines, has been both player and head coach since the season began in August.

Purefoods Star top official Rene Pardo did not hesitate to cut Orton loose.

“We have no intention of letting him play, everyone is angry,” Mr. Pardo, speaking in Tagalog, told Philippine reporters. “It’s like he went to the US and insulted the name of Martin Luther King.”

Indeed, few athletes are as revered in their home countries as Pacquiao is in the Philippines.

His story – that of a man who clawed his way from obscurity and poverty to world renown as a champion boxer – is one that resonates with millions of underprivileged Filipinos who dream of success.

As CBS reported in 2010:

In the Philippines he's an obsession – everybody watches every fight. When he's in the ring, the insurgents call a ceasefire in their running battle with the Philippine army. They're not risking anything, as the soldiers are watching too.

A reputation as a man of faith in a country that is more than 90 percent Christian only serves to bolster his image. His decision to involve himself in three other industries that Filipinos hold dear – music, film, and basketball – didn’t hurt him much, either, despite what may be his disputable ability to hit high notes, cry on cue, or dunk balls. (During the game in question, the eight-division boxing champ scored exactly 1 point.)

In 2010, when he ran for a seat in the Philippine Congress to represent his home province, “[h]e dominated the voting like he dominates most opponents,” according to Bleacher Report.

Pacquiao also recently made headlines after his long-awaited fight with boxing legend Floyd Mayweather, Jr. was finally scheduled for May 2.  

Does all – or any – of that mean the PBA’s decision against Orton was fair? Some think not.

“Who would want to play in a place where criticism of an opponent would be met with such a response?” wrote Jack Winter, hoops writer for Uproxx.com.

Orton, a former big man for the Orlando Magic, Oklahoma City Thunder, and Philadelphia 76ers, also reportedly accused PBA officials of making biased calls during the Purefoods-Kia game.

“The way the game was going, the refs, they made it into a mockery, seriously,” Philippine news outlet InterAksyon quoted Orton saying. “They took the game that I know and love and made it into a mockery.”

In addition to Orton's team cutting him loose, the league also slapped him with a $5,600 fine for “issuing comments that are disparaging, disrespectful of and offensive to his host league, the game officials, and a fellow player and head coach of a member-team,” PBA commissioner Chito Salud said.

“This insulting behavior will never be condoned by this league,” Mr. Salud added.

Orton has since issued an apology on Twitter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.