Why women aren't happy with Victoria's Secret 'Perfect Body' message

Victoria Secret's new bra campaign has prompted a British online petition to change it.


Victoria's Secret is promoting their new line of bras with the words "The perfect 'body.'" But it appears the lingerie company has a narrow definition of what that is.

Three British students are petitioning the company to apologize for and amend their "irresponsible marketing" campaign after seeing the words positioned over uniformly slender models in mall advertisements.

"We would like Victoria’s Secret to apologise and take responsibility for the unhealthy and damaging message that their ‘Perfect Body’ campaign is sending out about women’s bodies and how they should be judged," the petition begins.

The three women urge the company to change the wording on their advertisements to something that does not promote "unhealthy and unrealistic standards of beauty" and to pledge to not use "such harmful marketing in the future."

The letter calls out the advertisements for playing on women's insecurities, and says it sends a damaging message by positioning the words 'The Perfect Body' across models who have "exactly the same, very slim body type."

The petition also prompted a Twitter campaign, with many using #iamperfect to tweet @VictoriasSecret to spread the message.

"Every day women are bombarded with advertisements aimed at making them feel insecure about their bodies, in the hope that they will spend money on products that will supposedly make them happier and more beautiful," the women write in the petition. "All this does is perpetuate low self-esteem among women who are made to feel that their bodies are inadequate and unattractive because they do not fit into a narrow standard of beauty. It contributes to a culture that encourages serious health problems such as negative body image and eating disorders."

The petition says that since Victoria’s Secret is hugely popular among young women, they have a responsibility to not use "harmful and unhealthy" ideas to market their products.

Victoria's Secret UK did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Other brands have also been the subject of similar criticism – and even boycotts. 

Abercrombie & Fitch CEO Mike Jeffries set off a "cultural backlash" last year after saying his company was primarily interested in "good-looking people." The brand has come under heat for not catering to plus-size teens. 

For the past decade, Dove has notably broadened its definition of beauty with women of all shapes and sizes in its ads. In 2005, for example, it ran a series of ads featuring Irene Sinclair, 96-year-old grandmother from London. The Christian Science Monitor reported:

The ads, featuring Sinclair and five other women, represent an attempt to widen the definition of beauty and help women feel good about themselves. As a Dove spokesman says, "It's a campaign to debunk beauty stereotypes. A woman does not have to be 5 feet, 10 inches and perfectly proportioned in a magazine-cover image."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why women aren't happy with Victoria's Secret 'Perfect Body' message
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today