Why 12 Nobel Peace Prize winners are calling Obama out

President Obama's fellow Nobel laureates are raising questions about transparency regarding the Central Intelligence Agency's torture tactics post-9/11. 

Courtesy of Pete Souza/The White House
President Barack Obama looks at the Nobel Peace Prize medal at the Norwegian Nobel Institute in Oslo, Norway, Dec. 10, 2009.

Twelve Nobel Peace Prize winners are looking for answers from President Barack Obama about US torture.

Specifically, they want their fellow laureate winner to make public a Senate report on the Central Intelligence Agency's interrogation tactics since Sept. 11, 2001 that some say amount to torture.

In a letter and petition to the president Sunday, they said the "open admission by the President of the United States that the country engaged in torture is a first step in the US coming to terms with a grim chapter in its history."

They want Obama release the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence summary report as an opportunity for the country and world to see "the extent to which their government and its representatives authorized, ordered and inflicted torture on their fellow human beings."

They pointed out the group has reason to feel strongly about torture – some of them have survived torture, many have helped their nations through recovery.

"It is with this experience that we stand firmly with those Americans who are asking the US to bring its use of torture into the light of day, and for the United States to take the necessary steps to emerge from this dark period of its history, never to return," they wrote.

The group outlined steps for the United States "to recover the standards on which the country was founded, and to once again adhere to the international conventions it helped to bring into being." In addition to full disclosure about the extent and use of torture, these included the closure and dismantling of 'black sites' used for torture and interrogation, the closing of Guantanamo prison, and the upholding of international law with respect to conflict, especially the Geneva Convention and the UN Convention against Torture.

The release of the report remains in limbo as the CIA, the Obama administration, and Congress debate how much of it should be redacted.

Meanwhile, Obama's legal team is considering reaffirming the Bush administration's position on the United Nations Convention Against Torture – that cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment does not apply to CIA and military prisons overseas, anonymous officials told The New York Times earlier this month.

And the Obama administration must decide quickly. The letter from the Nobel laureates comes less than a month before the administration is set to send a delegation to present to the Committee Against Torture, a UN panel that monitors compliance with the treaty.

Obama was awarded the Peace Prize in 2009 "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why 12 Nobel Peace Prize winners are calling Obama out
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today