Chile education reforms caught in tangle of interests

Education reforms are needed to improve student achievement and boost lagging labor force productivity. The business community could benefit, but is deterred by higher taxes.

Eliseo Fernandez/Reuters
Chilean teachers take part in a demonstration against the government to demand changes in the public state education system, in Santiago on June 25, 2014.

Efforts to reform the Chilean education system and create a more productive labor force are hitting roadblocks, literally, as some 150,000 teachers went on strike across the country this week demanding higher pay and improved conditions.

For the business sector, the planned education reform is painful because President Michelle Bachelet plans to pay for it by increasing taxes by 3 percent of gross domestic product, as well as by increasing the corporate tax rate to 25 percent by 2017. The corporate tax rate is currently 20 percent. However, the education reforms are crucial for improving student achievement and boosting a labor force that is less productive than many other nations, according to our correspondent in the capital of Santiago, where some 50,000 teachers marched Wednesday.

“The mining industry is facing a huge productivity problem, and part of it comes down to training to international standards,” says our correspondent. “Chile wants to develop a more innovative economy that will [depend on] better higher education.”

President Bachelet has proposed ending public funding to for-profit schools, making all primary and secondary education free of charge, creating more universities, and increasing kindergarten funding as well as preschool institutions. The reforms, some sent to Congress on May 19, were a key part of her election campaign last year, and in direct response to university students who have organized massive protests to raise education quality and lower costs.... For the rest of the story, continue reading at our new business publication Monitor Global Outlook.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.