Is Russia now the strongest backer of peace in Syria?

Russia has emerged as a strong backer of Kofi Annan's peace plan for Syria, and is now hammering Western nations for not doing enough to support it.

Maxim Shemetov/Reuters
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov adjusts his headphones during a joint news conference with Chinese counterpart Yang Jiechi and Indian counterpart Somanahalli Mallaiah Krishna in Moscow Friday.

Russia today challenged Western countries to get behind United Nations envoy Kofi Annan's peace plan for Syria, or accept the blame for its failure.

It's a new role for Russia, which endured months of accusations that it was blocking a solution for strife-torn Syria after it vetoed two UN Security Council resolutions in the past several months calling for the removal of Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.   

But last month, Moscow threw its weight behind Mr. Annan's plan to end the year-long uprising, which has killed more than 9,000 people by UN estimates. It called for a withdrawal of all government forces from Syrian towns and cities, followed by a shaky cease-fire that went into effect last Thursday and appears to be just barely holding despite multiple violations alleged on both sides.

Speaking in televised remarks today, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov implied that the shoe is on the other foot now, with Moscow strongly backing the UN peace plan for Syria and willing to hold both Mr. Assad and his opponents to task but, he alleged, the effort is being undermined by unnamed Western and Arab countries.

"There are those who want Kofi Annan's plan to fail," Mr. Lavrov insisted. "Today, those who from the beginning foretold the failure of Annan's plan are doing a lot to see to it that this prophecy comes true… They are doing this by delivering arms to the Syrian opposition and stimulating the activity of rebels who continue to attack both government facilities and civilian facilities on a daily basis."

The cease-fire remains "quite fragile" because of the reluctance of those outside forces to fully back the Annan plan, Lavrov suggested, although he added that Assad bears a share of blame for the continuing uncertainty. "Of course, government forces are also taking measures to react to such provocations, and as a result it is not all going very smoothly yet," he said.

Analysts say that Lavrov is making the most of Moscow's recent shift away from months of single-minded support for the Assad regime and its apparently sincere embrace of the Annan plan

"This is an unaccustomed place for Lavrov to find himself, unambiguously on the side of peace and reason in Syria," says Alexander Konovalov, president of the independent Institute for Stategic Assessments in Moscow.

"But, in fact, he's got a point. The Annan plan needs to be supported, if only because it is the only plan out there. If other forces aren't getting on board, and are indeed covertly fanning the flames of civil war as Lavrov alleges, then they and their backers will be to blame if the whole thing collapses. After months of being accused of obstructionism, this looks much better for Russia," Mr. Konovalov adds.

Lavrov received a cautious vote of support from visiting members of the Syrian opposition today, who praised Russia for distancing itself from the Assad regime but urged it to do more to promote genuine democratic reforms in Syria.

"The representatives of the Russian government aren't inclined to support the idea of preservation of the dictatorial regime," Haytham Manna, spokesman for the Arab Commission for Human Rights, told a Moscow press conference today. "They are talking about the need for continuing democratic changes, and that's very important for us… Russia has all the necessary levers to apply pressure on Assad's government and help Annan's mission."

Abdul-Aziz al-Kheir, head of the National Coordination Body for Democratic Change in Syria, which opposes armed insurrection, agreed that Moscow's stance on Syria has been changing rapidly over recent weeks.

"[The Annan plan] is the last chance to end the fratricidal massacre and create preconditions for the transfer to a democratic form of government," he told the press conference.

Some Russian experts say that changing conditions in Syria, where Assad's military forces have gained the upper hand in recent weeks, are the main reason that Moscow's diplomatic hand appears to be strengthening.

"Until last week the West's preference was for a victory of the rebels at any price, but now there's a lot less enthusiasm for that," says Dmitry Babich, an expert with the official RIA-Novosti agency in Moscow. "This happened mainly because the rebels failed to seize any big cities and because of Assad's military success. So if the tables have turned, it hasn't been done by Russia.

"Actually, Russia's position hasn't changed much," Mr. Babich adds. "Moscow was never a passionate fan of Assad, and wasn't ready to do anything to save him, but it was alarmed at the idea of any more precedents that would license massive outside interference into the affairs of a sovereign country." 

Get daily or weekly updates from CSMonitor.com delivered to your inbox. Sign up today.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.