Germany designates a wing of far-right AfD party 'extremist'

Known as "The Wing," the radical group of German's far-right AfD party is under surveillance and branded an "extremist entity" by the German intelligence agency. Germany continues to respond to increasing acts of racism and anti-semitism.

Michele Tantussi/Reuters
Amplifying extremism? A microphone stands in front of an AfD (Alternative fuer Deutschland) logo in the German Bundestag in Berlin on March 12, 2020. A wing of the AfD party was labeled as "extremist" by German intelligence agency on Thursday.

German authorities are formally placing parts of the far-right Alternative for Germany party under surveillance after classifying it as extremist, the country's domestic intelligence agency said on Thursday.

Thomas Haldenwang, head of the BfV intelligence agency, said that after more than a year of examination his office has concluded that a radical faction within Alternative for Germany (AfD), known as "The Wing," meets the definition of a "right-wing extremist movement."

"This is a warning to all enemies of democracy," said Mr. Haldenwang, noting that it was his agency's duty to prevent growing far-right extremism from overthrowing the country's democratic order the way the Nazis did in the 1930s.

Alternative for Germany immediately criticized the move, which allows authorities to use covert methods to observe The Wing and its estimated 7,000 supporters. They make up about 20% of the party's overall membership but hold significant sway over its direction, according to former party members including its one-time leader Frauke Petry.

The Wing is led by AfD's regional chiefs in the eastern states of Thuringia and Brandenburg, Bjoern Hoecke and Andreas Kalbitz.

Mr. Haldenwang described Mr. Hoecke and Mr. Kalbitz as "right-wing extremists," noting Mr. Hoecke's historical revisionism, his anti-Islam, and anti-immigrant rhetoric and his close ties to other known extremists outside of the party. Mr. Hoecke has described Berlin's memorial to the victims of the Nazi Holocaust a "monument of shame" and called for a "180-degree turn" in the way Germany remembers its Nazi past.

"We mustn't just keep an eye on violent extremists but also watch those who use words to spark fires," said Mr. Haldenwang, adding that anti-Semitism, hatred of Islam, and racism spread online or in political arenas provides the "breeding ground" for violence.

Germany has been shaken by a series of far-right killings over the past year, including the slaying of a regional politician from Chancellor Angela Merkel's party, the attack on a synagogue in Halle, and a deadly mass shooting targeting people with migrant backgrounds in Hanau.

The New York Times reported

The Hanau shootings add to an expanding number of far-right attacks, in a political environment that has grown more combative with the AfD’s rise.

The number of far-right hate crimes surged from 2017 to 2018, to 1,664 from about 1,200, according to police statistics. The attacks – including stabbings, beatings, threats, and harassment – targeted minorities and politicians who voiced support for refugees.

"Right-wing extremism and terrorism are currently the biggest threats to democracy in Germany," Mr. Haldenwang told reporters, adding that more than 200 people have been killed by right-wing extremists in the country since 1990.

Mr. Kalbitz, the AfD leader in Brandenburg, called the intelligence agency's decision "factually unfounded and completely politically motivated."

Putting The Wing under increased surveillance could strengthen calls for it to be banned. Germany's top court rejected a bid to outlaw the far-right NPD party in 2017, deeming it too insignificant in part because it had no presence in parliament. Alternative for Germany, by contrast, has seats in all 16 state assemblies and the federal parliament.

Intelligence scrutiny of the The Wing could also have consequences for any supporters who are civil servants or state employees.

"They will get into trouble" with their superiors in the future because the AfD faction's aims run counter to the German Constitution they swore to uphold, Mr. Haldenwang said.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. Material from The New York Times was used in this report. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.