German Vote-O-Meter matches voters and candidates on policy

The creators of "Wahl-O-Mat," a German website that helps undecided voters choose their ideal candidate, hope their tool will increase voter engagement in the upcoming federal election.

Kai Pfaffenbach/Reuters
Protesters demonstrate with signs reading "I will never vote for CDU Party again" as German Chancellor Angela Merkel, a top candidate of the Christian Democratic Union Party (CDU), attends an election rally in Vacha, Germany on August 24, 2017.

Three weeks before Germany's election and with at least one poll suggesting nearly half of all voters don't know what they will do, the government has unveiled an updated online tool to help them decide.

Around two dozen young people from around Germany helped launch the "Wahl-O-Mat" (roughly Vote-O-Meter) on Wednesday – an online website that matches people with a party after they answer a series of policy questions.

One of the first to try was Hubertus Heil, general secretary of the Social Democrats (SPD), junior partner in Chancellor Angela Merkel's ruling coalition.

"I got 100 percent," he beamed after completing the 10-minute process.

Participants choose whether they agree, disagree or are neutral about 38 issues identified in recent months by 26 young people chosen from 500 volunteers. The issues center on key topics such as increased video surveillance, raising taxes on diesel cars, and setting limits on migration.

Merkel is widely expected to win a record-tying fourth term, with her CDU/CSU conservatives maintaining a two-digit lead over the SPD despite continuing concerns over her 2015 decision to allow in over a million migrants.

But it remains unclear which parties will be involved in the next coalition government.

A poll by the Allensbach institute last week showed that 46 percent of voters had not made up their minds on how to vote – the highest rate since in two decades so close to an election, which is being held on Sept. 24.

The voter tool is available online at or via apps on mobile phones. A pared-down analog version will also tour Germany over the next three weeks for those not online.

The tool has been around before, and less official versions have been available in other countries.

But Thomas Krueger, head of the Federal Agency for Civic Education, which created it, expects many millions of hits.

It was used over 13.2 million times in the last national election in 2013 and even more people are expected to participate this time, he said.

"We've seen that about six percent of those who were not planning to participate in the election changed their minds after using the tool," he said.

Markus Blume, general secretary of the CSU, the Bavarian sister party of Merkel's CDU, said voter participation had been higher in recent state elections and he hoped the trend would continue for the national election.

"Germany is experiencing a re-politicization because people realize we are living in uncertain times, that a great deal is at stake in this parliamentary election, and that it's not irrelevant who's elected."

Richard Hilmer, director of the Berlin think tank Policy Matters, said the tool was critical, especially for younger voters who had not been involved in politics before.

"Interest is definitely higher in this election, but so is uncertainty. It remains to see how that will affect participation. It could well be that if people remain uncertain that they simply stay home."

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to German Vote-O-Meter matches voters and candidates on policy
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today