Despite petition, UK prepares royal welcome for Trump

The British government has formally rejected a petition calling for President Trump’s British state visit to be canceled or downgraded in formality.

Kevin Lamarque/Reuters/File
British Prime Minister Theresa May and President Trump hold a joint news conference at the White House in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 27, 2017.

In a statement posted Tuesday, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office rejected an online petition requesting that the British government cancel or remove the official status of President Trump’s forthcoming state visit.

Rather than demanding an outright ban on Mr. Trump’s proposed visit, the petition had requested that his visit be downgraded from an official state visit, which would involve meeting with Queen Elizabeth and a formal state banquet in the Buckingham Palace Ballroom.

The petition states that Trump’s “well documented misogyny and vulgarity disqualifies him from being received by Her Majesty the Queen or the Prince of Wales” and said that such a visit “would cause embarrassment to Her Majesty the Queen.”

But despite having garnered more 1.8 million signatures – far beyond the 100,000 threshold which requires the subject be debated in Parliament – the government is simply not ready to threaten ties with its biggest ally.

The official response reads, “HM Government recognises the strong views expressed by the many signatories of this petition, but does not support this petition.”

The British government rejected the petition on the grounds that Prime Minister Theresa May had already invited Trump during her visit to the United States on Jan. 27 and planned to stand by that invitation as an indication of "the importance of the relationship between the United States of America and the United Kingdom." The date of the official visit has yet to be announced.

As the nation prepares for its “hard exit” from the European Union, Britain must negotiate new bi-lateral arrangements independently, something May is eager to hammer out with the US.

For his part, Trump lauded the Brexit vote in an interview with former British conservative leadership contender Micheal Gove, calling the decision “smart” and saying “people, countries, want their own identity and the UK wanted its own identity,” according to The Guardian.

In a diplomatic gesture, the prime minister sent Trump a letter before her January visit that included a copy of Winston Churchill’s famous speech to the American people on Christmas Eve of 1941. In her letter, May reiterated that the “sense of unity and fraternal association between the United Kingdom and United States – is just as true today as it has ever been,” according to The New York Times.

For his part, Trump said he would return a bust of Winston Churchill to the Oval Office, a well-received action across the Atlantic.

A counterpetition, “Donald Trump should make a State Visit to the United Kingdom,” with more than 310,000 signatures, urged the government to roll out the welcome mat for Trump: 

“He is the leader of a free world, and U.K. is a country that supports free speech and does not believe that people that oppose our point of view should be gagged.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.