Why did Belgium and the Netherlands just swap land?

In territorial disputes, armies are usually close behind an army of lawyers. Belgium and the Netherlands are charting a friendlier approach.

Didier Lebrun/Reuters
Belgian Foreign Minister Didier Reynders and Dutch counterpart Bert Koenders sign a border correction treaty in Amsterdam on Monday as Belgian King Philippe, Belgian Queen Mathilde Dutch King Willem-Alexander, and Dutch Queen Máxima look on, during an official state visit to the Netherlands.

If you’ve heard of war, you’ve heard of land swaps. But Belgium and the Netherlands have a peachier model of trading territory.

The two countries signed a treaty on Monday that redraws their borders, putting two small parcels of Belgian land along the Meuse River under the Netherlands’ control in exchange for a slightly smaller piece lying adjacent to it, on the opposite side of the river.  

At the signing ceremony, Dutch foreign minister Didier Reynders called it “proof that borders can be redrawn in a peaceful way”, according to the Express.

“What’s important to underline is that today, in Europe, we’re able to modify the borders without using weapons,” added Marcel Neven, the mayor of nearby Visé, Belgium.

The deal has its roots in the 1961 straightening of the river, which made it easier for ships to navigate the winding waters of a historical trade corridor. An aid to boat captains, the straightening also created unforeseen problems for Belgian authorities, who say that the parcels have become “enclaves of lawlessness” that they can’t easily reach, since the Meuse cuts them off from the rest of the country.

It’s a rare example of international goodwill over territorial issues, one made easier, perhaps, by neither country standing to lose much in the way of resources. No one lives on the lands, nor do they host any significant buildings. And the amount of territory on the line is relatively small – the Netherlands will come out with an extra 15 soccer fields’ worth. But it also required the goodwill to go through with years of legal wrangling, making it a testament to the close friendship between the two countries.

That friendship made all the difference, Belgian military historian Luc De Vos told the Associated Press in 2015.

“It is possible between Belgium and the Netherlands because these countries have a lot of ties for centuries and after the second world war territory was no longer that important,” he said then.

For years, Belgian authorities had complained that the lands on the opposite side of the river were turning into havens for drug dealers and prostitution, but the process of trading the lands got a jolt in 2012 when passersby discovered a body.

Belgian police, prosecutors and forensics units had trouble reaching the scene: as the area, a peninsula, had no proper landing zones, they couldn’t easily travel there by boat, nor could they reach it by crossing into the Netherlands without special permission, according to Deutsche Welle.  

"You had to jump from the boat onto the shore. You needed to be in shape for this," Mr. Neven, the mayor of Vise, told the AP.

Theo Bovens, the governor of the Netherlands’ Limburg province, told Dutch News that drafting the treaty was a time-consuming process.

“Ministries from both countries, the water authorities, the land registry, the provincial governments, three local councils and districts are involved,” he said.

The treaty signing is part of a three-day visit to the Netherlands by Belgium’s king and queen. The deal will go before both countries’ parliaments for approval, with the redrawing of the borders becoming official in January 2018.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why did Belgium and the Netherlands just swap land?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today