Bulgaria bans the veil, echoing European trend

Bulgaria's face-covering ban echoes similar bans by other countries in Europe, as lawmakers struggle to reconcile secular, liberal values with an influx of Muslim immigrants from the Middle East. 

Ali Jarekji/REUTERS/File
EU Commissioner for International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response Kristalina Georgieva (R) visits Syrian refugees at their temporary house in Amman in 2012.

Following in the steps of lawmakers in France and Belgium, the Bulgarian parliament voted to ban facial coverings, or veils such as burqas, on Friday.

The new law potentially affects the 12 percent of Bulgaria’s population who are Muslim, many of whom are ethnic Turks. Women are now banned from wearing clothing that partially or completely covers the face.

Similar bans, such as France’s recent burkini ban, have faced opposition by those who say that they restrict a woman’s right to make personal choices about her clothing. Bulgaria’s government says that the law is not targeted, and is instead a public safety measure.

"The law is not directed against religious communities and is not repressive. We made a very good law for the safety of our children," said Bulgarian parliament member Kasimir Velchev, according to Reuters.  

Other countries have passed burqa and veil bans for similar reasons. One of the first to consider and approve banning the veil in public places was France, which introduced a law preventing women from wearing the burqa in 2010 due to a desire to protect French secularism and public safety. Belgium followed in 2011, citing similar reasons.

In 2015, the Dutch parliament also approved a burqa ban in areas such as schools, hospitals, transportation, and government buildings. Proponents of the ban said that the measure was a common sense safety measure, as it allowed all people to be identifiable at all times.

“People have to be recognizable in such areas,” said Afshin Ellian, a professor of jurisprudence and human rights expert at the University of Leiden in The Netherlands. “And anywhere in a free society, it is crucial that people are able literally to look each other in the face.”

Most recently, several French cities and municipalities made the decision to ban the burkini, a full body swimming costume favored by many Muslim women, after recent terrorist attacks raised tensions in France. Local regulations in seaside communities such as Cannes stated that the burkini was a symbol of extremism, and an affront to France’s secular culture.

"Beachwear which ostentatiously displays religious affiliation, when France and places of worship are currently the target of terrorist attacks, is liable to create risks of disrupting public order," read Cannes’ regulations.

Critics of such restrictions on Muslim women say that European governments are curbing free speech and the free practice of religion.

"Women in Bulgaria should be free to dress as they please and to wear the burqa or the niqab as an expression of their identity or beliefs," said Amnesty International’s Europe Director John Dalhuisen.

In 2014, a European human rights court upheld France’s burqa ban, saying that the veil could sequester women off from the rest of society, and hinder the formation of interpersonal relationships.

The European Court of Human Rights wrote in its opinion, that:

“The Court was also able to understand the view that individuals might not wish to see, in places open to all, practices or attitudes which would fundamentally call into question the possibility of open interpersonal relationships, which, by virtue of an established consensus, formed an indispensable element of community life within the society in question.”

France’s current burkini bans also faced legal challenges from human rights groups, with the bans eventually rejected by a French court

Yet despite opposition, burqa bans continue to crop up across Europe, with similar laws under discussion in Austria, Switzerland, and Britain, as the refugee crisis brings more and more Muslim men, women, and children to Europe.

Nevertheless, lawmakers in many of the countries which have passed or are considering these bans say that their decision is not prejudicial, but instead based on civic ideals.

"We want to be able to look into peoples’ faces in our society," Austrian politician Heinz-Christian Strache said in a press conference.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Bulgaria bans the veil, echoing European trend
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today