Think you're spy material? Britain's MI6 is hiring

The head of Britain's intelligence service made a rare public appearance in Washington, D.C., this week, where he commented on new challenges faced by the agency.

Dan Chung/Reuters/File
A British police officer stands in front of the headquarters of the MI6 intelligence service in central London, Sept. 21, 2000, after a small missile was fired at the building.

The ranks of Britain's intelligence agency MI6 will swell from 2,500 to approximately 3,500 by 2020, according to a report published by the BBC on Wednesday, as spy services in countries around the world point to the increasing primacy of cyberattacks as a tool of conflict between states.

The agency has not confirmed the figure, as it doesn't make public the size of its staff. But in a rare public appearance in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, MI6 chief Alex Younger acknowledged the growing use of the internet is greatly affecting the agency's procedures.

"The information revolution fundamentally changes our operating environment," said Mr. Younger, according to the BBC. "In five years' time there will be two sorts of intelligence services: those that understand this fact and have prospered, and those that don't and haven't. And I'm determined that MI6 will be in the former category."

"Our opponents who are unconstrained by conditions of lawfulness or proportionality can use these capabilities to gain increasing visibility of our activities which means that we have to completely change the way that we do stuff," he said.

The growth of the internet as an integral tool has meant that spy services and other government security agencies are wandering into what former secretary of defense Robert Gates once called "dark territory," when it comes to the prospect of preparing for cyberwar. The new era's inaugural moment may be 2010, when a US worm took down an Iranian nuclear centrifuge, deeply scrambling Iran's efforts to enrich enough uranium gas to produce a bomb.

But recent hacks on American targets by actors that US cybersecurity experts link to Russia are giving Western intelligence agencies new reason for worry. Last week, Adm. Mike Rogers, director of the US National Security Agency (NSA) told a Senate hearing that an "aggressive investigation" was under way into the possibility that foreign governments could be trying to undermine the presidential elections, though he would not confirm that hacks of voting machines in two states were the work of nation-states, according to Reuters.

"I will say this, that it continues to be an issue of great focus ... for the foreign intelligence community, attempting to generate insights into what foreign nations are doing in this area," said the admiral.

Younger, who spoke alongside his counterparts from the United States, Australia, and Canada, also suggested that the agency expects the threat of terrorist attacks by Islamist extremists against Western targets to persist, even if territory controlled by the Islamic State is recaptured, given the "deepening sectarian divide in the Middle East," according to Sky News.

"There are some deep social, economic and demographic drivers to the phenomenon we know as terrorism," he said. "Allied with the emergence state failure, I think that regrettably this is an enduring issue."

He also spoke out against the leaking of National Security Agency data by former contractor Edward Snowden, saying it made the work of British intelligence agencies such as the MI6 and the GCHQ harder.

Those comments come on the heels of a new, sympathetic biopic of Mr. Snowden directed by Oliver Stone – one accompanied by a push from human-rights groups to get Snowden pardoned by President Obama – that may do much to rehabilitate the former contractor's image among much of the US public, putting them in league with the opinion of much of the globe, as The Christian Science Monitor noted this month.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.