As Greece votes, many in EU root for a once-reviled leftist firebrand

Former Prime Minister Tsipras is now seen as one who could offer Greece the stability it needs to move beyond its political and financial crises.

Thousands of supporters attended the final campagin rally for former Greek prime minister and leader of leftist Syriza party Alexis Tsipras prior to Sunday's general elections on Athens' Syntagma square.

When leftist firebrand Alexis Tsipras was surging in polls ahead of Greek elections in January, Brussels looked on with dismay.

But the former prime minister, who resigned in August and called new elections, is facing Greeks' judgment again on Sunday. And the same European leaders who once hoped for his political demise might be rooting for him this time.

The conditions that have given rise to radical leftism in Europe still spook the political set. But in the eyes of many, Mr. Tsipras – who once called creditors “criminals” – is best positioned to give Greece the grounding it needs amid political and economic disillusionment, the prospect of far-right extremism, and a growing migration crisis as he deploys his leftist credentials to navigate Greece through unpopular reforms ahead.

“[European Union leaders] think he can control society … that the situation is most stable with Tsipras,” says Valia Aranitou, a professor of political sociology at the University of Crete.

This is the third time Greeks are being asked to vote this year alone – first during the snap elections in January, and then during a referendum on bailout terms in July. In each case, they have voted for Tsipras on his promise to “rip up” bailout agreements, known here as the "memorandum." Instead, what they got was a third bailout with stricter terms.

Indeed, one reason Europe isn't wary of Tsipras anymore is that as a leader, he has proven far more radical in rhetoric than in practice.

That has cost him support from followers. While Syriza garnered 36 percent of the vote in January, most polls see the party neck-and-neck with or just slightly ahead of center-right New Democracy.

New Democracy was once Brussels’ preferred winner. Under the party’s leadership, heading into the January race, Greece saw a slight economic improvement. But today the picture isn’t so simple.  Whoever wins Sunday’s race must oversee painful reforms required by the 86-billion-euro bailout package that Tsipras signed in August. If New Democracy wins, Syriza could once again turn into the fiery opposition that will fuel opposition to the bailout, instead of playing the role of the party in power trying to manage its implementation.

As Professor Aranitou puts it:  “If we have to have a memorandum, it is better to have it with Syriza.”

Not all Greeks see it that way. Paris Kormaris, a magazine editor in downtown Athens, joined the tide of Greeks supporting Syriza in January because it promised to undo years of austerity and EU-mandated policies.  

“The Tsipras government was elected to do something totally different than what at the end it was obligated to do,” he says. Like Tsipras, Mr. Kormaris is reversing his original stance – this time, voting for the right.

Such political to-and-fro is worrying to Nikos Demertzis, a professor of political sociology at the University of Athens. He says one of the beneficiaries could be the extreme right party Golden Dawn, which polls indicate will be the No. 3 party.

“There has been a widespread anti-Westernism that has accelerated and been accentuated during the last three years,” Mr. Demertzis says. That could make some voters ripe for the rhetoric of ethno-nationalism, he says, and of a “Greece surrounded by enemies.”

And now the migration issue, with thousands of refugees from the Middle East and North Africa landing on Greek shores as they flee violence at home, has given the party another flame to fan. That has EU leaders on alert as they grapple with growing anti-foreigner sentiment on the continent.

“Greece has got to stop hosting foreigners and send them home,” Golden Dawn leader Nikos Michaloliakos told a crowd at a campaign rally Wednesday. He, like Hungarian officials, has called for “the army to be sent in” to protect Greece’s borders.

Of the front-runners, neither party is expected to get the roughly 38 percent of votes needed for a majority in the 300-seat parliament. It is almost certain that only a coalition party can lead. New Democracy has said it would govern with Syriza. But Tsipras has rejected forming a coalition with the mainstream party, instead saying he would seek partnership with the anti-austerity, right-wing Independent Greeks, with whom he governed after his win in January, or even one of the smaller pro-bailout parties in the center. 

While some in Europe would welcome a broad coalition with Syriza and New Democracy at the helm, there are political risks. It could disillusion those who supported Syriza precisely because it was not the mainstream, possibly giving a boost to more extremist factions. Already some say the political maneuvering of the past year has discredited all politicians. 

Areti Talasoglou, a tennis trainer, says no politician is acting like a public servant. “It’s their personal interest over the general interest,” he says. “That’s why I will not vote. I will abstain.” In fact, he says, for the first time in his life he is considering moving abroad.

Eleni Farasteli, a civil servant, says she has no idea who she is voting for – but believes it makes no difference anyway. “One or the other will win,” she says, “and the same mess will continue.”

Sara Miller Llana reported from Paris.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to As Greece votes, many in EU root for a once-reviled leftist firebrand
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today