David Cameron offers plan to counter attraction to join extremism

Prime Minister David Cameron announced new measures on Monday meant to crush the infrastructure that has made it possible for as many as 700 young Britons to join radicals abroad.

Paul Ellis/PA via AP
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron delivers a speech, where he said that new Government legislation will include powers to put non-violent extremists who radicalize young people 'out of action,' at Ninestiles Academy in Birmingham, England, Monday, July 20, 2015. Cameron is launching a five-year plan to defeat Islamic extremism, saying it's time to counter the ideology that has attracted so many young people to the Islamic State group. In what is being billed as his most important speech on the subject, Cameron says the extremist ideology of the group, also known as ISIL, must be countered so Britain becomes a more cohesive nation in which young Muslims feel they have a stake.

Prime Minister David Cameron sought Monday to dissuade young Muslims from joining the Islamic State group, saying they would only become "cannon fodder."

Cameron announced new powers designed to put those who radicalize young people "out of action," together with plans to allow parents to cancel their children's passports to prevent them from traveling abroad to join a radical group. The measures are meant to crush the infrastructure that has made it possible for as many as 700 young Britons to join radicals abroad, he said.

In a wide-ranging speech that targeted the ideology of extremism, Cameron chose a school in Birmingham, a center of the Muslim community in Britain, to argue that it was time to counter the narrative that has attracted so many young people to the Islamic State group, also known as ISIL. Britain must "de-glamourize" such groups by making the young aware of the stark reality of life under their control, he said.

"You won't be some valued member of a movement. You are cannon fodder for them. They will use you," he said. "If you are a boy, they will brainwash you, strap bombs to your body and blow you up. If you are a girl, they will enslave and abuse you. That is the sick and brutal reality of ISIL."

Cameron also announced a study designed to find ways to increase opportunities for young people from ethnic minorities and increase their integration in society. He said a strategy would be published later in the year as part of a five-year-plan to wage what he defined as the struggle of a generation.

Some Muslim organizations reacted with dismay, sensitive to suggestions that they are somehow to blame for extremism, particularly since the paths to terrorism are complex and varied.

There is a danger of suggesting there is a "magic solution that will make terrorism go away," said Shuja Shafi, secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain.

"We worry, however, that these latest suggestions will set new litmus tests which may brand us all as extremists, even though we uphold and celebrate the rule of law, democracy and rights for all," Shafi said.

Cameron acknowledged that young people are vulnerable to radicalization in part because many, though born in Britain, have little attachment to the country. In some communities, people can "go your whole life and have little to do with people from other faiths and backgrounds."

"So when groups like ISIL seek to rally our young people to their poisonous cause, it can offer them a sense of belonging that they can lack here at home," he said.

"We have, in our country, a very clear creed and we need to promote it much more confidently," he said. "Wherever we are from, whatever our background, whatever our religion, there are things we share together."

"We are all British," he said.

Brooke Rogers, a terror expert at King's College London, said Cameron tried to do too many things in a single speech — offering a confusing message. The top-down approach is also frustrating to people working against radicalization at the local level, where progress is often slow but usually more successful.

"They need to really listen to the people at the coalface," she said of those on the front-line fighting radicalization.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.