Neo-nazis no-show their annual march in Dresden. Is Pegida to blame?

Counter-protesters, expecting to face off against neo-Nazis, were able to speak for inclusiveness unopposed in Dresden today. The far right's absence may be a result of the rise of anti-Islamization group Pegida.

Kay Nietfeld/AP
From left, Dresden's Mayor Helma Orosz, German President Joachim Gauck, partner of the German president Daniela Schadt, Saxony's Prime Minister Stanislaw Tillich, and Head of the German Muslims Aiman Mazyek gathered in Dresden on Friday to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the allied fire bombing that devastated the city during World War II.

Every year on Feb. 13, locals link arms to form a human chain across the Elbe River and Dresden’s old town. The gesture is part symbol of remembrance of the World War II bombings that left the once-pristine city in ruins – and part act of defiance against a coinciding neo-Nazi march.  

This year there was still a chain – but no visible neo-Nazis, in their first no-show in the nearly 10-year-long marching tradition.

Instead, a mishmash of picketers protesting the extremists’ possible presence spread across in front of Dresden’s famous Frauenkirche (Church of Our Lady), as prominent politicians spoke in solemn commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the British and American bombings.

Observers say that in fact, the neo-Nazis' absence may be due in part to the rise of a group that many accuse of harboring the same sort of hatreds that the neo-Nazis do: Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamization of the West, or Pegida. Whether by drawing support from the neo-Nazis or by raising the public's resistance to the messages, Pegida seems to have thrown the neo-Nazis' annual march off stride.

“Maybe it would be too stressful [for the neo-Nazis] to show up,” says local Maria Rohr, who watched a smaller podium devoted to anti-Islamophobe speeches behind the official event. “They knew the opposition would be great this year and probably wanted to march on a calmer day, when their views wouldn’t be drowned out.”

Overlapping movements

Since the late 1990s, Dresden has earned a notorious reputation, courtesy of annual neo-Nazi marches on the Feb. 13 anniversary of the city's firebombing by Allied forces in 1945. That notoriety was further enhanced in recent months as Pegida emerged in the city. The movement, nominally against radical Islam but accused of harboring broad anti-immigrant sentiments, grew from a Facebook page created in October 2014 into a protest group that drew tens of thousands to weekly marches held as recently as last month.

Although the two groups are often cast in a similar light, their messages and constituencies overlap but differ.

Pegida draws support from people with a broad swathe of ideologies – including neo-Nazis – and taps into German frustrations about a range of issues, ranging from reforming Germany’s immigration policy to relations between Russia and Germany, said Dresden city spokesperson Kai Schulz. “A lot of people within Pegida are just normal people.”

A study published at the beginning of February by Dr. Hans Vorländer, a professor at Dresden’s Technical University, described the average Pegida member as a man between the ages of 25 and 49, is undereducated, lives in Saxony, served in the Bundeswehr, Germany’s Army, and is self-employed.

But there are neo-Nazis embedded within Pegida. About one-third of Pegida members sport right-wing ideologies, while the rest are simply “disenchanted with the current political situation,” says another Technical University professor, Werner Patzelt, who sent students to survey members of Pegida as they marched through the city.

And many say Pegida are far from their claims of “Wir sind das Volk” – or “We are the people” – a slogan popularized in the Leipzig demonstrations of 1989 that peacefully led to the demise of communism. Over the past three months, the number of attacks on refugees in Germany has tripled – something that Andreas Zick, who researches violence, told Der Spiegel is sparked by the ideology put forth in part by Pegida members at their now dwindling weekly protests.

Dr. Patzelt says that neo-Nazis did indeed join Pegida, in hopes of making their positions publicly heard in a group that dwarfed their own numbers, and was viewed as more moderate. But as Pegida protests dwindled in size in recent weeks – the last march drew 2,000 as opposed to the whopping 25,000 immediately after the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris – the neo-Nazis no longer had a strong outlet to vent their frustrations.

Furthermore, the international media attention cast on the most extreme members of the Pegida sent a clear message that "Nazis are not welcome" in Dresden and sapped their overall strength, says Richard Mauser, a local resident who toted a sign that said everyone has a place in his city.

'Foreigners aren't to be feared'

Dresden’s attempt to recast itself as an accepting city – dual defiance against neo-Nazis and Pegida – could be seen in the days leading up to today's events. For weeks, the city was coated with posters proclaiming “February 13, 2015: With Courage, Respect and Tolerance: Dresden avows itself to color.”

Large local non-profit Forum Dreizehnter Februar themed its Feb. 13 programming around immigration and multiculturalism in Dresden, with an upcoming roster of exhibitions and plays casting the spotlight on Islam, as well as Judaism and other minority religions.

“Dresden is going through the same demographic transition that West Germany was in the '60s and '70s,” says forum spokesperson and Dresden native Kai Viertel. “We need to educate ordinary citizens here that foreigners aren’t to be feared. Their acceptance still hasn’t caught up to that in the West.”

The human chain itself – as it has been since its creation in 2010 – is a “sign of solidarity," said Mr. Schulz. "We think of the family we have lost, but also live further on in peace."

But there still could be work to do, warned local university student Nils Rübelmann, who carried one of many bright yellow “Refugee Welcome” signs seen in the crowd on Friday.

“We know how the people in Pegida think and we know how the counter-protesters think,” says Mr. Rübelmann. “It’s really the people who are doing nothing that we don’t know about. There could be a lot of opinions to change.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.