From the Monitor archives: Ottoman Empire attacks Odessa, entering WWI

The Ottoman Empire shelled the Russian port of Odessa 100 years ago today, entering into the Great War on the side of Germany and Austria-Hungary.  The Christian Science Monitor reported as it happened.

Bundesarchiv, Bild 134-B3821 / CC-BY-SA
The German cruiser Breslau, after being sold to the Turkish Navy and rechristened the Midillih in 1914.
The Christian Science Monitor, ProQuest
Page 1 of the Oct. 30, 1914, edition of the Monitor. The story about the Turkish bombardment of Odessa appears on the far right.

This article originally ran in The Christian Science Monitor on Oct. 30, 1914.

Before Oct. 29, 1914, the Ottoman Empire, also called Turkey, was officially on the sidelines of the war in Europe. But despite frequent protestations of neutrality (one of which is cited below by the Monitor), Turkey was clearly aligned with the German Empire. One of the more obvious examples was that of the warships Breslau and Goeben mentioned below. The two German ships were in the Adriatic Sea when the war broke out, and quickly became high priority targets for the British fleet. After some two weeks of pursuit, the German ships escaped into the Dardanelles to the Ottoman capital of Constantinople – where they were promptly "sold" to the Ottoman Empire.

In fact, Turkish hawks secretly signed a mutual defense pact with Germany just before the war began. The pact was not made public – indeed, even some high-ranking members of the Turkish government were unaware of it. But it set the stage for the Ottoman Empire to enter the war at a moment German and Turkish planners deemed most advantageous – a moment that came on Oct. 29 in Odessa, against Russia.

Please note that the article uses several outdated spellings and shorthands for names and cities. Modern names and spellings have been inserted in brackets where applicable. Also, the term "Porte" is a reference to "the Sublime Porte," a nickname for the Ottoman Empire's central government.


Notwithstanding the Reiterated Ottoman Embassy Statements in London, Hostile Action Toward Russia Is Taken


Ever Since the Purchase of the Breslau and Goeben From the Germans There Has Been Expectation Porte Intervention

(By the United Press)

WASHINGTON – Odessa was bombarded last night and American prop­erty destroyed, according to a state department despatch from the Petrograd charge today. This information was based on a report from the American consul at Odessa. It was assumed in official circles here that the bombardment was done by the Turks.

Again and again, during the last month the Turkish embassy has as­sured the London representative of the Monitor that there was no prospect of Turkey intervening against her old protectors, France and the United Kingdom, in the present struggle. Yet yesterday, without a moment of warning, the Turk­ish fleet in the Black sea, imitating the example of the Japanese fleet at Port Arthur, commenced war against Russia by attacking the Tsar’s ports.

There is no doubt that this step has been long contemplated, and that it has been taken by the Porte after deliber­ate consideration. No one has ever believed, for one moment, that the pur­chase of the Breslau and the Goeben was a bona fide transaction.

Turkey Short of Funds

Turkey had no money with which to pay for the warships and the explanation given by the embassy in London to the representative of The Christian Science Monitor that the price was a sum al­ready due by Berlin to Constantinople was ludicrous in the extreme. The fact is that ever since the advent of [German Foreign Minister] Marschal von Bieberstein, German influence has been as dominant at the Porte as ever British influence was in the days of the great Elehi [Stratford Canning, former British ambassador to the Ottoman Empire].

Germany has quite naturally and quite legitimately been anxious to secure the intervention of Turkey, with a view not only to occupying the attention of Russia on the shores of the Black sea and in the direction of Armenia and Persia, but also of raising difficulties for France and the United Kingdom throughout their vast Muhammadan [Muslim] possessions.

Ever since the purchase of the Breslau and the Goeben the Turkish ministers must have been aware that the end of the war would bring a day of reckoning with the triple entente.

Enver Pasha [one of the "Three Pashas" who ruled the Ottoman Empire], who is a Muhammadan of Muhammadans, has, however, appar­ently gained complete control at Constantinople over the more cautious Diavid and Talaat.

Conceived Great Coup

It was he who conceived and engi­neered the great coup of the occupation of Adrianople [Edirne, in modern Turkey] which enabled Turkey to laugh in the face of the great powers. Ever since then he has been intent on doing at Salonika [Thessaloniki, Greece] and Cairo what he achieved at the expense of Bulgaria. He has absolutely staked the Ottoman empire on the success of Austro-German aims, nor is it by any means certain that in the event of the success of those arms he will not find that he has merely exchanged King Stork for King Log.

At the moment the possession of the Goeben will give the Turks an enormous superiority in the Black sea. The great cruiser, when it took refuge in the Dardanelles, had been to some extent dam­aged by the British guns. This was ad­mitted by the Turkish naval attache in London to a Monitor representative at the time.

Means must have been found to repair this damage, and the retention of the German crews on board a ship of such complex mechanism was rendered abso­lutely necessary. Here again Turkey is aware that she has infringed her neu­trality. The German crews should have been interned in Turkey, as the English marines have been interned in Holland. In spite of this, they have been kept on board the ship, obviously with a view to the present crisis.

It is almost impossible that the action of Turkey, however, can have no fur­ther effect on the extension of the war. It is almost bound to bring about a renewal of the Balkan alliance plus the cooperation of Rumania. If this proves to be the case Turkey, pressed on her European side by the enormous united forces of Bulgaria, Rumania and Greece, and on her Asiatic side by the army which Russia has been carefully massing there, will probably find that she has fallen from the frying pan into the fire.

At present nothing Is known of her action beyond the fact that she is said to have threatened or bombarded the ports of Theodosia [Feodosia, in modern Crimea] and Novorossiysk in the Black sea. It is necessary to wait for exact confirmation of what has oc­curred here, as well as to see what effect her action will have at Athens, and in Bucharest and Sofia.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to From the Monitor archives: Ottoman Empire attacks Odessa, entering WWI
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today