Cameron promises political reform as British election looms. Is EU listening?

Prime Minister David Cameron has promised to hold a referendum on Britain's EU membership, while also devolving more powers within Britain following the Scottish referendum. Success at home could boost his chances in Brussels.

Luke MacGregor/Reuters
Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron makes his keynote speech on the final day of the Conservative Party Conference in Birmingham, central England, October 1, 2014.

British Prime Minister David Cameron rallied his Conservative Party faithful today with a promise to “deliver” on a pledge of “English votes for English laws” after Scots last month wrangled a pledge for increased powers within the United Kingdom. 

“I love this country – and my goal is this: To make Britain a country that everyone is proud to call home,” he said, closing the party’s last conference before next year’s election.

But after Scotland’s close-fought Sept. 18 decision to stay in the union, Mr. Cameron faces tough reforms ahead, not just to give Scotland the devolution it was promised in the heat of the referendum campaign but to assuage the English that the minority Scots aren’t getting the better end of the deal.

It’s unclear how willing, or able, Cameron will be to push through deep change in how Britain is governed. He faces distrust from Scottish nationalists, from the opposition Labour Party, and within his own party, which rules under a coalition government.

If reelected next year, Cameron has said that he will seek to renegotiate the terms of British membership of the European Union ahead of a promised referendum by 2017 on whether to remain in the 28-member bloc.

By addressing Britain’s domestic governance, including devolution and associated fiscal reform, he could prove his reform credentials and fend off Euroskeptic challengers.

If successful, says Jan Techau, director of Carnegie Europe in Brussels, Cameron could demonstrate to other European nations, from Italy to Germany, that painful state reforms are possible – and that the EU’s current structure has become untenable. 

“He could become a strong political figure of Europe. It would be an enormous reversal of his luck,” says Mr. Techau, who compares Cameron’s potential impact to that of Margaret Thatcher as a modern leader who transformed Britain.

But Cameron faces a daunting task, not least in securing a second term. The Scottish referendum has cost him politically as he underestimated the nationalist fervor brewing north. “He lost a lot of political capital,” says Simon Griffiths, a politics lecturer at Goldsmiths, University of London. “A lot of politicians in his own party, who are very strongly unionist, see him as the politician who took Britain to the brink of collapse.”

And his promises of more powers for the Scottish parliament has raised a firestorm of protest, especially for English who say that it’s unfair that Scots, the Welsh, and Northern Irish get separate voting bodies, but England only has Westminster

Cameron has said more Scottish devolution depends, in essence, on more English devolution. But the leeway that Cameron has to get there is unclear, says Mr. Griffiths. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.