Abu Qatada: Britain says radical cleric can't come back after acquittal in Jordan

Abu Qatada, who had asylum in Britain, was accused of involvement in a plot to target Israeli and American tourists as well as Western diplomats during millennium celebrations in Jordan.

Mohammad Hannon/AP
Family and friends of radical Al Qaeda-linked preacher Abu Qatada, center, greet him as he arrives to his family's home in Amman, Jordan, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2014. A Jordanian court on Wednesday acquitted Qatada — known for his fiery pro-al-Qaida speeches — of involvement in a plot to target Israeli and American tourists and Western diplomats in Jordan more than a decade ago. The three-judge panel unanimously acquitted Qatada "because of the lack of convincing charges against him," said Judge Ahmed Qattarneh.

Radical Islamist preacher Abu Qatada was cleared of terror charges by a Jordanian court today, but British authorities quickly ruled out any possibility of his return to the United Kingdom, where he was granted asylum 20 years ago.

The court acquitted Abu Qatada, who infuriated the British government with his impassioned speeches in support of Al Qaeda, of involvement in a plot to target Israeli and American tourists as well as Western diplomats during millennium celebrations in Jordan, according to the Associated Press.

The ruling punctuates a 15-year legal battle saga that played out in Britain and Jordan. Abu Qatada was deported to Jordan last year after fighting extradition from Britain for years.

The court's ruling Wednesday bookends another case, involving a plan to attack an American school in Amman in 1999, for which he was acquitted in June, according to the AP.

Britain’s Home Office moved quickly to reiterate its stance from earlier this summer: Abu Qatada will not be allowed back.

“He can’t come back, and he won’t come back. He is a Jordanian and he does not have a UK passport. He is also the subject of an indefinite deportation order as well. He would not be granted permission to enter the UK, end of story,” the office said, according to The Guardian.

Home Secretary Theresa May, who headed UK government efforts to remove Abu Qatada, also cited a UN travel ban, the BBC reported.

Abu Qatada arrived in Britain in 1993, and was granted refugee status a year later because he had been tortured by Jordanian authorities, the Monitor reported.

But British authorities began to revise their opinion of him after he vocally espoused a militant Islam, giving sermons that urged suicide attacks and the targeting of Jews.

In response to the verdict, which surprised many, Britain’s immigration and security minister, James Brokenshire, said: “it is right that the due process of law has taken place in Jordan,” according to the AP. He said Britain deported Abu Qatada because he posed a threat to national security.

During his stay in the UK, Abu Qatada was convicted of conspiring in the two Jordanian plots but both convictions were thrown out as they were based on evidence gathered under torture, according to the BBC.

Jordan and the UK eventually concluded a treaty banning the use of such evidence from trials in Jordan involving British deportees, allowing the British government to deport Abu Qatada.

Abu Qatada spent much of his time in the UK in maximum security prisons and under house arrest, according to the Guardian. But the extended delay over extradition ultimately played in his favor, it notes.

David Blunkett, who was Home Secretary when Abu Qatada was detained in 2002, told the BBC the length of time it took to deport him complicated securing a conviction. “Abu Qatada's managed to do what he wanted to do, which was to prevaricate for 10 years. By doing that he's made it very much more difficult for the prosecution. However, it also proves that he was wrong, because the case he made against extradition was that he wouldn't receive a fair trial in Jordan and he clearly has.”

The AP reported Judge Ahmed Qattarneh said the Jordanian three-judge panel acquitted Abu Qatada “because of the lack of convincing charges against him.”

Despite his radical credentials, the Muslim cleric has become an outspoken critic of the Islamic State, condemning the group’s excessive use of violence.

During a court appearance earlier this month, he criticized the group’s beheading of Western journalists, saying, “Journalists shouldn’t be killed – it’s not permitted because they are messengers of the truth, unless they are working for foreign intelligence,” according to the BBC.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Abu Qatada: Britain says radical cleric can't come back after acquittal in Jordan
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today