Can Scotland divorce London without alienating the EU?

While independence-minded Basques, Catalonians, and Corsicans may view Scotland's referendum as something to emulate, the Scottish first minister has distanced himself from their causes.

Manu Fernandez/AP
The Scottish blue-and-white saltire waves among Catalan flags during a demonstration calling for the independence of Catalonia in Barcelona, Spain, last Thursday.

Europeans seeking more autonomy from central governments – from Catalans and Basques in Spain to the Flemish in Belgium and Corsicans of France – have looked with admiration at Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond's pro-independence campaign.

But the last thing Mr. Salmond wants to do is become the spokesperson for the such secessionist movements because it could hurt an independent Scotland's own future within the European Union.

When Catalans rallied last week for their own independence from Spain, some Scottish flags flew in a sea of Catalan ones. But Salmond was quick to emphasize that what happens in Scotland isn't a template for the rest of Europe.

“This is a great process that we’re having in Scotland, I think it’s a fantastic thing,” Salmond said at a press conference in Edinburgh that day. “This is an agreed democratic process, and that’s the key distinction.”

Spain has outright rejected even the notion of a referendum for Catalonia, which is holding a non-binding vote on Nov. 9. Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy today described such referendums as "a torpedo below the waterline for European integration.” By contrast, both sides in the United Kingdom have accepted this referendum and agreed to negotiate a solution whichever way Scots vote. 

But Salmond's comments are also meant to woo Europe. His driving logic for Scottish independence is that Edinburgh doesn’t need London. Yet an independent Scotland would rely on the support of other European capitals if it wants to be an EU member. If he were to cozy up with Catalonia, for example, he risks alienating Spain’s central government.

“I think there is a sense in the senior ranks of the Scottish National Party that they don’t want to, at least at this stage, be seen as some kind of rallying point or symbol for the rest of these continental movements,” says Daniel Kenealy, a public policy and EU expert at the University of Edinburgh.

Still, those Europeans favoring independence can’t help but feel inspired by Salmond. 

Iñaki Muniain, a resident of Bilbao in Spain’s Basque Country, says he has supported Basque independence since his childhood and admires Salmond. “Or more than admiration it’s jealousy, that he’s giving the people the chance to vote,” says Mr. Muniain.

Democratic gap

At a meeting last week between the two main Basque nationalist parties, the PNV and SORTU, the president of the latter lamented on local radio that, unlike in Scotland and Catalonia, Basque leaders have not been able to unite around independence. In the Basque daily Deia, an August editorial argued that the Scottish referendum highlights "the enormous democratic gap that exists between the United Kingdom and the Kingdom of Spain.”

“I don’t know if it’s better to be independent or not, but I am in favor or people having the right to vote for what they want,” says Muniain.

Of course, while Salmond will be heralded if his vote is victorious, a result for "yes" would only be the first step. Scotland's prospects would then depend on how successfully it can negotiate with Westminster. And then Scotland would turn to the difficult task of negotiating its position inside the EU.

“The euphoria of Friday could quite quickly be replaced by tricky negotiations that don’t go Scotland’s way,” says Mr. Kenealy. "It could be that Scotland becomes a symbol of all the difficulties [of independence], as opposed to the hope and optimism in the aftermath of the vote.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Can Scotland divorce London without alienating the EU?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today