Russia promises new aid convoy to Ukraine as fighting in east surges

Experts say that the aid, combined with a new rebel offensive in Donetsk, strengthen Putin's bargaining position ahead of tomorrow's possible meeting with Poroshenko.

Maxim Zmeyev/Reuters
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is seen through a viewfinder of a video camera during a news conference in Moscow on Monday. Russia is willing to use any form of diplomacy to end the conflict in Ukraine, Mr. Lavrov said on the eve of a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian presidents.

Amid reports of a surge in fighting between government forces and Russian-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Monday that Moscow will be sending a second humanitarian convoy into the war-torn region as early as this week.

Experts say that both the rebel claim of a new offensive to break the Ukrainian army's weeks-old siege of Donetsk and Mr. Lavrov's announcement are part of the maneuvering ahead of Tuesday's possible face-to-face meeting between Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in Minsk.

"On one hand we are seeing a concerted effort to demonstrate that the anti-Kiev rebels are not cornered, as much of the Western media has declared, and that they are very much a viable force that will have to be negotiated with at some point," says Sergei Strokan, foreign affairs columnist with the Moscow daily Kommersant.

On the other hand, he says, Moscow is staking out its claim to be a provider of humanitarian assistance to the largely Russian-speaking populations of Luhansk and Donetsk, where hundreds of thousands of people have been trapped for weeks, with only sporadic gas and electical power, and dwindling supplies of food, drinking water, and medicines. Last Friday a Russian convoy of 280 trucks, said to be carrying 2,000 tons of essential supplies, entered Ukraine without permission from the Kiev government and delivered the materials to Luhansk, before returning to Russia.

The Russians argue that Western powers themselves set the precedent that humanitarian aid should trump the rights of a sovereign government just last month – with Russian support – when the United Nations Security Council voted unanimously to allow assistance to be delivered to rebel-held areas in Syria even over the objections of the central government in Damascus.

"Look, all other considerations aside, people down there need help," says Vladimir Zharikhin, deputy director of the Kremlin-funded Institute of the Commonwealth of Independent States in Moscow. "Russia is willing to help them. We feel close to them, and this is a peaceful and constructive way of demonstrating our solidarity."

Mr. Lavrov said he hopes Kiev will drop its reservations, which delayed the first convoy for over a week, and cooperate in clearing the second one to deliver supplies this week. "We have no secrets here," he insisted.

But there doesn't seem to be much transparency regarding the ongoing supply of Russian military materiel to the rebels. Moscow adamantly denies it, but credible observers have seen it happening and rebel leaders have boasted of receiving it.

That question hangs over the conflicting reports of fighting around Donetsk Monday. The rebels claimed that their newly re-organized "army" has gone on the offensive, was pushing back Ukrainian forces, and recapturing territories they had earlier lost, and even  advancing on the city of Mariupol where the pro-Kiev government of Donetsk region currently sits. Kiev insisted its forces were battling a column of Russian tanks that had crossed the border in the far southeast and was making a thrust for Mariupol. Neither side has a very good track record of accuracy.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.