EU corruption report's big offenders: Romania, Bulgaria

The first-of-its-kind report, released today, says that corruption costs Europe $162 billion annually. The findings may prove most problematic for the EU's newest members.

Yves Logghe/AP
European Commissioner for Home Affairs Cecilia Malmström addresses the media, at the European Commission headquarters in Brussels on Monday. Corruption affects all 28 member countries of the European Union and costs their economies around $162 billion a year, the EU’s first report on corruption says.

It’s perhaps telling that the European Commission never before issued a report on corruption. Europe is, after all, largely considered one of the “cleanest” in the world, with the Scandinavian countries in particular always winning global rankings on transparency.

But the extent of corruption across Europe, revealed in a first-of-its kind report today, is “breathtaking,” European Union Home Affairs Commissioner Cecilia Malmström told Sweden's Goeteborgs-Posten newspaper.

The report says that none of the 28 members of the EU is immune from corruption, and that it costs their economies a total of $162.2 billion a year.

The findings hurt the image of the EU overall, but they’ll do more harm to certain countries, particularly those hit worst by economic crisis and the newest full-fledged members, Romania and Bulgaria.

Ms. Malmström said in a statement released ahead of the report that "corruption undermines citizens' confidence in democratic institutions and the result of law, it hurts the European economy, and deprives states of much-needed tax revenue,” she said. "Member states have done a lot in recent years to fight corruption, but today's report shows that it is far from enough." 

The report is good news for the north. “Answers confirm a positive perception and low experience of bribery in the case of  Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, and Sweden,” it notes. These residents say they’ve rarely paid a bribe – less than one percent – and the percentage of those saying they believe corruption is widespread at home (20 percent, 29 percent, 42 percent and 44 percent respectively) is significantly below the EU average of 76 percent.

It’s not such good news for the south, however. In Portugal, Spain, and Italy, almost everyone feels corruption is widespread, at 90 percent, 95 percent, and 97 percent respectively (even though the actual act of bribe-paying in these countries is less than 3 percent). The European Commission concludes that recent political scandals and the economic and financial crisis have contributed to their disillusionment.

That mirrors findings from Berlin-based Transparency International released last year, and show the eurocrisis undermining the public’s trust in institutions, especially within the countries most indebted.

"There is a deterioration in public trust in public institutions,” Anne Koch, regional director for Europe and Central Asia at Transparency International, told The Christian Science Monitor after the July release of the organization's poll. “There is a sense that Europe is slightly adrift politically.”

Today’s report might be most damaging for Romania and Bulgaria, which are part of the EU but only had their work restrictions lifted in several EU countries on January 1. 

The report showed that both countries, along with Croatia, the Czech Republic, Lithuania, and Greece, experience significant levels of actual bribe-paying and high percentages of those who say corruption is widespread at home.

They are slated to become part of the passport-free Schengen zone. But nations such as France have argued that their commitment to rule-of-law is not up to par yet. Findings today will only add to those arguing that Romania and Bulgaria should remain out for now.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.