As protests boil, EU keeps arms open to Ukraine

Kiev rejected closer ties to the EU last month. But many say the intensity of pro-EU demonstrations show that Brussels should not give up on Ukraine.

Ivan Sekretarev/AP
Protestors wave flags rallying at the central Independence Square in Kiev, Ukraine, on Monday. Hundreds of Ukrainian protesters have blocked entrances to the government building and called for the ouster of the prime minister and his cabinet.

The European Union may not be as popular as it was, but events in Ukraine are showing it still has appeal.

Despite being racked by increasing "euroskepticism" and economic woes, the 28-member bloc is the object of affection of tens of thousands of Ukrainian demonstrators who continue to march the streets in the biggest protests since the country's "Orange Revolution" of 2004 – all prompted by support for the EU.

On Sunday, protesters unfurled the EU flag in the capital of Kiev and demanded the resignation of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych after he turned away from an association agreement with the EU that could have paved the way for the country's future membership. On Monday, demonstrators reportedly blockaded the government's main headquarters using trash bins and flowerpots to keep out government workers.

While Mr. Yanukovych's decision handed Russia, which deeply opposes Ukraine's rapprochement with the EU, an immediate victory, the daily marches that have escalated since have revealed widespread support for the EU. Analysts say that this is a signal that the bloc needs to keep reaching out to Ukraine and its other eastern neighbors, despite the recent setback.

“The demonstrators in the street are clearly calling for Ukraine to follow a path based on the kind of values and principles that the EU represents,” says Michael Leigh, a senior adviser to the German Marshall Fund of the United States in Brussels. “It is clearly not a time for the EU to step back.”

Ukraine divided

After violent crackdowns over the weekend, hundreds of thousands of protesters marched Sunday and demanded the resignation of Yanukovych, with demonstrators yelling “Gang, get out!” Some 1,000 protesters on Monday blocked passage into government-run buildings in Kiev.

Kiev announced earlier in November that it was halting its preparations to sign an association agreement with the EU. The agreement had been scheduled to be signed on Friday at the Eastern Partnership summit in Vilnius, Lithuania.

The government's reversal came in part because of the Ukrainian parliament's rejection of a bill that would have allowed jailed opposition leader and Yanukovych foe Yulia Tymoshenko to travel to Germany for medical treatment. The EU had conditioned the association agreement on the release of Ms. Tymoshenko, who is serving a seven-year sentence for abuse of power during her tenure as prime minister. Many in the EU regard her conviction as selective justice.

Pressure from Russia also was key in derailing the agreement. Moscow has been lobbying Kiev to join its customs union – which the Kremlin envisions as a counter to the EU – for immediate discounts on Russian energy prices and a continuation of the relatively open border between the two countries.

At the same time, Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that Ukraine's huge trade with Russia would suffer if Kiev goes with the EU. In recent months, Russia imposed a ban on Ukrainian chocolate imports and threatened to make Kiev pay in advance for its Russian gas imports.

A poll this November by the firm GfK showed that Ukrainians largely rejected this type of pressure: 45 percent of Ukrainians said they supported integration with Europe, compared with 15 percent who preferred integration with Russia.

Euroskepticism

Ukraine's support for the EU project comes at a time when it is badly needed.

While skepticism in the EU can be exaggerated, polling revealsl rising mistrust of Brussels and the eurozone. The 2013 Transatlantic Trends survey by the German Marshall Fund showed that the percentage of respondents who say that EU membership has been good from their economy is down 10 percentage points since 2011, to 57 percent today. Majorities in almost all countries surveyed said the adoption of the euro had been bad. In a recent global attitudes poll by the US-based Pew Research Center, from 2012 to 2013, the favorable rating of the EU dropped from 60 percent to 41 percent.

While polling had shown Ukrainians supporting the EU agreement, the size and scope of protests demanding a westward shift in Ukraine have been a surprise, Mr. Leigh says.

The EU has made clear its support for Ukraine by saying that the association agreement will still be on the table if Ukraine meets all the conditions required. It has also condemned authorities' violence against protesters over the weekend.

Now, Leigh says, EU and Ukrainian leaders in favor of European integration should try to win over ordinary Russia-leaning Ukrainians by doing a better job of describing the fine print of the association agreement – so they understand that, for example, an agreement with the EU doesn't preclude trade with Russia. Leigh adds that the EU could also place a priority on person-to-person contact, such as by promoting more scholarships, so general society understands that the EU cares about regular people's lives, not just trade and economics.

'A critical point'

Amanda Paul, an analyst at the European Policy Center in Brussels, says that Europe has generally paid more attention to the south than the east, but now Ukraine needs its full attention.

“It is European integration that stopped Ukraine from being the next Belarus,” she says. “If you remove it, democracy risks being much more undermined. We are in a critical point.”

The EU could gain the upper hand, argued Christoph Hasselbach of Deutsche Welle, as long as it does not water down its conditions and it stresses all parties would benefit, even Russia. 

“That is not going to work with Putin and Yanukovych still around,” he wrote in a column published Friday. “But society is changing, in Russia as well as in Ukraine. And that's not just down to influence from the EU, but also because of change from within. Things could be very different in a few years' time.”

There is a risk that anger at the protest violence and a seemingly power-hungry president will overshadow the larger ideals of integration, institutions, and rule of law in Ukraine.

Kyryl Savin, an expert on Ukraine at the Heinrich-Böll Foundation in Kiev, says that the question of Europe was at the forefront of the initial protests, but after violent crackdowns over the weekend and a general escalation of tension, the EU issue has taken a back seat to domestic politics.

“Now it is about the question of a new government, a new president, and new election,” he says. “European integration will be the next step.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.