Who'll blink first? Putin debates Netanyahu on Iran.

The Kremlin, which has long backed a negotiated solution with Iran, isn't going to yield to Israel's objections, say Russian experts.

Maxim Shemetov/Reuters
Russian President Vladimir Putin (r.) shakes hands with Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during their meeting in the Kremlin today in Moscow. Each is hoping to persuade the other that their respective approach to nuclear talks with Iran is in error.

Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu met with President Vladimir Putin Wednesday in what experts say was a last-ditch attempt to persuade Russia to slow the international community's momentum toward a nuclear deal with Iran, as talks open today in Geneva.

A terse note posted on the Kremlin's website said only that Mr. Netanyahu's "brief working visit" dealt with a range of global and regional issues, including bilateral cooperation.

Experts say Mr. Putin, who has warmly welcomed prospects of an accord with Iran at the P5+1 talks – which includes the five permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany – is unlikely at this late date to change Moscow's views, which have aligned quite closely with those of Iran.

But news agencies quoted Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Ze'ev Elkin, who accompanied Netanyahu to Moscow, as saying even incremental changes in the Kremlin position could help.

"Our job is to try to sway the Russians, as we have been doing with all the players," he is quoted as saying. "Russia is not going to adopt Israeli positions wholesale. But any movement, even small, in the Russian position can affect the negotiations."

Russian experts said Putin's aim going into the meeting with Netanyahu was to try to persuade the Israeli leader to drop his hardline resistance to any deal with Iran, and to accept that the international community can close an agreement that would arrest Iran's alleged movement toward a nuclear weapon and be good for Israel's security.

"Russia will do its best to convince Israel to soften its irreconcilable stance and drop the demand that sanctions against Iran should be toughened," says Vladimir Sotnikov, a leading Russian Middle East expert.

"The fact that Netanyahu came to Moscow to talk it out with Putin is a positive sign. It's certainly hard to move the Israelis from their positions, but I have some cautious optimism that it can be done. Such talks are a two-way street," he says.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told journalists Wednesday that he believes this round of negotiations will be successful in concluding an accord, despite Israeli opposition and escalating tensions over Tuesday's twin bombings outside the Iranian embassy in Beirut that killed at least 23 people.

"I'm doubtful Netanyahu can change anything. The Russian delegation [to Geneva] has already received its instructions; they know what to do and what to say," says Vladimir Sazhin, an expert with the official Institute of Oriental Studies in Moscow.

"Everyone should start looking forward, because much will depend on how Iran cooperates in the framework of the interim agreement," that seems likely to be concluded in Geneva this week, Mr. Sazhin says.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.