Germans happy with Obama win, but still disagree on austerity

If Germans could have voted, Obama's reelection would have been a foregone conclusion due to the president's 85 percent approval rating.

Jens Meyer/AP
Americans and Germans celebrate with flags around cardboard figures of US President Barack Obama, left, and Gov. Mitt Romney, right, during the 'Election Party' organized by the US consulate in Leipzig, Germany, on Tuesday.

There isn’t a single front page in Germany today that does not carry a picture of a triumphant Barack Obama and his family, and most newspapers do not hide their satisfaction about Obama’s reelection.

America’s better half” is the headline of the left-leaning Tageszeitung, “Obama raises new hope” says Berliner Zeitung.

But there are hints too that Germany has certain expectations. “Do it again, but better” reads the headline of Germany’s influential weekly Die Zeit.

If Germans could have voted for a US president, the elections would have been a foregone conclusion. A survey just before the elections by pollsters YouGov found that 85 percent would vote for Obama with only 4 percent in favor of Mitt Romney. Support for Obama is found in all age groups and across Germany’s social and political spectrum. The number of those who think that the president has done a good job so far is considerably lower though – around 60 percent.

The enthusiasm for Obama might seem surprising, given that the president did not meet a number of German expectations, says Johannes Thimm of the German Institute for International and Security Affairs in Berlin.

“While Obama replaced the unilateral foreign policy of the Bush administration with a multilateral approach his focus was much more on the Asian-Pacific region,” Mr. Thimm says.

Europe did not feature in the election campaign, and the German government was irritated by American insistence on a stimulus package to overcome the eurozone debt crisis when the official German cure was rigid austerity. Further, Obama did not manage to close the Guantanamo prison camp – an issue that Germans feel strongly about – and he intensified the drone attacks on insurgents in Afghanistan, again, a policy seen very critically in Germany.

On the other hand there is a lot of sympathy here with Obama’s social and economic objectives. Obamacare is to most Germans, who grew up with mandatory health insurance, a matter of obvious necessity. The president’s efforts to help the struggling US car manufacturers was applauded by German trade unionists and employers alike.

What remains to be seen though is whether Germans are still so fond of Obama when the president – in his efforts to sort out America’s budget and debt problems – tells Europe, and most of all Germany, to shoulder a bigger share of responsibility in solving political, financial, and military crises around the globe.

“We can’t say we didn’t ask for it,” is the dry conclusion of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Germans happy with Obama win, but still disagree on austerity
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today