Modi's Hindu nationalist party defeated in New Delhi elections

Indian Prime Minister's Hindu nationalist party succumbed to a regional party in Delhi's legislative assembly elections on Tuesday. The stunning victory by the "common man's" party is seen as a response to India's new citizenship law. 

Manish Swarup/AP
Arvind Kejriwal (center) is garlanded at Aam Aadmi Party's headquarters as they celebrate in New Delhi on Feb. 11, 2020. AAP's victory over Indian prime minister's party was seen as a response to the government's citizenship policies that exclude Muslims.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist party was given a stunning defeat by a regional party Tuesday in elections in the national capital that were seen as a referendum on his policies, including a new national citizenship law that excludes Muslims.

Saturday's New Delhi legislative elections pit Mr. Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party against the incumbent Aam Aadmi Party, or "common man's" party, whose pro-poor policies focused on fixing state-run schools and providing cheap electricity, free health care, and bus transport for women during its five years in power.

Mr. Modi and Home minister Amit Shah appealed to majority Hindus by focusing on national issues such as the citizenship law, which triggered widespread protests, at the expense of problems facing the capital's millions of residents.

At least 23 people were killed in clashes between police and protesters in December.

With counting of votes almost complete, the Aam Aadmi Party, or AAP, had won 52 seats and was leading in another 10 of the 70 constituencies, while the BJP had won six seats and was leading in another two, the Election Commission said. The Congress party, led by Sonia Gandhi, was unlikely to win any seats.

Full results were expected later Tuesday.

The defeat was a setback to Mr. Modi's prestige, coming less than eight months after he led the BJP to a resounding victory in national elections. The party won all seven of the capital's parliamentary seats in those polls.

The victory was a major boost for AAP chief Arvind Kejriwal, the incumbent New Delhi chief minister and anti-corruption crusader.

Mr. Kejriwal joined hundreds of his supporters in celebrating the party's performance. In a brief speech, he said the election "has given birth to a new brand of politics – politics of development'' meeting people's basic needs.

Mr. Modi in a tweet congratulated Mr. Kejriwal for his party's victory. “Wishing them the very best in fulfilling the aspirations of the people of Delhi,” he said.

Local BJP leader Manoj Tewari denied the AAP charge that his party had tried to create a Hindu-Muslim divide during the elections. Hindus comprise more than 80% of India's 1.3 billion people and Muslims about 14%.

Mr. Kejriwal launched his party in 2012 and campaigned to rid the Indian political system and government of corruption and inefficiency.

The party's symbol – a broom – and its promise to sweep the administration of graft struck a chord with New Delhi's nearly 20 million people.

In the 2015 elections, Mr. Kejriwal's party won 67 seats and the BJP three.

Mr. Modi and Home Minister Shah campaigned vigorously in an attempt to unseat the AAP and capture power in New Delhi. The BJP last ruled New Delhi in the 1990s.

The new citizenship law fast-tracks naturalization for non-Muslim migrants from neighboring Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan who are living in the country illegally. The BJP also hoped to garner Hindu votes for ending the semi-autonomy of Muslim-majority Kashmir last summer and turning the disputed region into two federally governed territories.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to