William and Kate retrace Diana's steps to Taj Mahal

William and Kate, the Duke and Duchess of York, visited the Taj Mahal 14 years after his mother, Princess Diana, to wrap up their week-long trip to South Asia.

Adnan Abidi/Reuters
Britain's Prince William and his wife Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, pose in front of the Taj Mahal in Agra, India, April 16.

Where Princess Diana went alone, her son Prince William went with his wife Kate on Saturday – the Taj Mahal – bringing the British royal couple's week-long South Asian tour to a poignant close.

William and Kate sat together on the same bench where his late mother was photographed on her solitary visit in 1992.

Kate wore a slimline white dress with a navy pattern by Indian-American designer Naeem Khan, while William braved the intense afternoon heat in a blazer and open-necked shirt.

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge were rounding off a tour in which they met another glamorous young royal couple, the king and queen of Bhutan, and saw rhinos and elephants in a national park in Assam.

The final stop at the Taj Mahal was an emotional one for William, who was 15 when Diana died in a car crash in 1997. He has often spoken of how much he misses his mother, and has said that he thinks of her every day.

Diana's solo visit to the 17th-century mausoleum – built by Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan in memory of his favorite wife – came to symbolize her unhappy marriage to Prince Charles.

The couple separated months later.

Three of the Taj Mahal's four minarets were swathed in scaffolding for repairs. Still, images of William and Kate sitting before the onion-domed monument, its ivory colored marble translucent in the afternoon sunshine, were striking.

Asked about her impression of the Taj Mahal, Kate could be heard saying over the clatter of camera shutters: "It's really stunning."

It was raining earlier in the day when the couple flew out of Bhutan's only international airport, a day after they trekked to a Buddhist monastery 10,000 feet up a mountain.

They landed in Agra in afternoon temperatures that reached 105 degrees Fahrenheit. Much of India is suffering a heatwave and severe drought after two years of failed monsoon rains.

(Additional reporting by Sunil Kataria in Thimpu; Writing by Douglas Busvine; Editing by Louise Ireland)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.