Nepal avalanche: Climate change in action?

Avalanches and landslides in Nepal's Himalaya mountain range have been blamed on extreme weather during the peak trekking season. Glaciers are shrinking as a result of what scientists say is man-made global warming.

Nepalese Army/AP
Nepali soldiers carry an avalanche victim before he is airlifted from Thorong La Pass area of the Annapurna Trail on Wednesday.
Rich Clabaugh/Staff

The blizzard and avalanches that killed at least 27 people in Nepal earlier this week have raised questions about the role of climate change in extreme weather.

Climate scientists typically avoid linking specific events to climate change, but say rising global temperatures likely contribute to avalanches and other weather-related disasters in the Himalayas. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that extreme weather across the globe will increase in frequency and intensity as the Earth heats up.

Meteorologists say the blizzard in Nepal was likely triggered by Cyclone Hudhud, which swept the coast of India last week and then pushed north into Nepal. Reports suggest that the cyclone was among the strongest storms on record to have hit the region.

Storms in that region are getting stronger,” John Stone, an IPCC researcher, told The Toronto Star. “It is not inconsistent with what scientists have been saying.”

Melting glaciers in the Himalayas raise the risk of more deadly disasters, according to a report released in May by the International Center for Integrated Mountain Development, a research group based in Katmandu, the Nepali capital. 

The report says Nepal's total glacier area is decreasing fast. An average of 14.67 square miles of glacier vanished every year between 1977 and 2010, shrinking the total area of Nepal’s glaciers by nearly 25 percent – numbers that don’t bode well for hikers on the country's famed mountain trails. 

On Thursday, search teams rescued dozens of stranded foreign hikers and recovered bodies in Nepal’s northern mountains, CNN reports. They flew helicopters over the popular Annapurna Trail in search of others. But Ganesh Rai, a local police official, told Reuters that 10 people were still missing and presumed dead.

Thousands of foreign hikers flock to the Annapurna Trail each October, when the air is often clear and cool. The 150-mile circuit takes almost three weeks to complete and loops around Mount Annapurna, the world’s 10th-highest peak.

On Tuesday, at least 14 people died in the Thorong La Pass area of the trail and five more died in an avalanche on Mount Dhaulagiri, The Associated Press reports. The pass is nearly 18,000 ft above sea level. At least eight people died in Phu village in a separate avalanche on Wednesday.

This week’s death toll is another blow to Nepal’s mountaineering industry, which generates $3.4 million in permit fees each year for the impoverished country, Reuters reports. On April 18, an avalanche on Mount Everest killed 16 Nepali Sherpa guides. It was the deadliest disaster in history on the slopes of the world’s tallest mountain.

Reuters reports that the Nepali government has come under fire this year for doing little to improve safety conditions for hikers, despite charging them $20 for a permit.

"The government is happy collecting money from trekkers but doing nothing for them,” Keshav Panday, an official of the Trekking Agencies' Association of Nepal, told the news agency. “It must now spend the cash for making arrangements for weather forecasts and a quick response for rescue when hikers are in distress.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.