Cambodia: garment workers increase pressure for higher wages

Today's clash between striking garment workers and security forces in Phnom Penh underscores a growing push for better wages throughout the region.

Heng Sinith/AP
Cambodia garment workers withdraw following their confrontation with riot police during a strike near a factory on the Stung Meanchey complex on the outskirts of Phnom Penh, Cambodia, Friday, Jan. 3, 2014.

Standing outside the Chinese-owned factory where she’s sewn clothes for the past seven years, Tith Maordy was complaining about money, and how there’s never enough of it. For Cambodian garment workers, this is a familiar lament.

With overtime and weekend work, Ms. Maordy can make up to $130 a month at the factory, which makes jeans and t-shirts for a retailer in Canada — well above $80, which until recently was the legally mandated minimum wage. The problem is that wages aren’t keeping up with the cost of living. Rent is up, and the price of groceries has risen considerably in the past month, ever since the government started enforcing certain import duties. Yellow noodles cost more. So do lemons, sugar, and chili peppers.

“I borrow the money from people almost every month, especially towards the end of the month,” she says.

That’s at the heart of the labor dispute that sent tens of thousands of garment workers out on strike last week, shuttering scores of factories, hamstringing an important part of Cambodia’s economy, and challenging well-connected foreign clothing manufacturers, many of whom supply goods for global brands like H&M, Nike, Asics, Gap, and Adidas.

Today, the dispute escalated sharply when demonstrating workers and security forces clashed in south Phnom Penh and at least four protesters were shot and killed, according to a Cambodian rights group. The clash illustrates not only how closely interwoven the authoritarian government of Prime Minister Hun Sen is with foreign clothing manufacturers. It’s also representative of what’s happening in many developing nations, where governments take a hands-off approach and let foreign manufacturers use low-wage, low-skill workforces to build profitable business models.

“This is a general trend in Asia,” says Lee Siew Hwa, Southeast Asia coordinator for the Asia Floor Wage Alliance, a union umbrella group headquartered in India. “Everywhere strikes, protest actions are happening to demand the living wage or the [minimum wage] that are able to support a decent life for workers.”

'A proper living'

Cambodia’s walkout started after the government announced an increase in garment workers’ monthly wage to $95 from $80, instead of an immediate doubling to $160 demanded by union leaders. Though the ministry’s plan called for a slightly larger bump every year through 2018, topping out at $160, unions and workers did not want to wait, viewing the government’s offer as not reflecting the industry’s booming profits here.

According to the Ministry of Commerce, garment exports from Cambodia have risen 22 percent over the first 11 months of 2013, to reach $5.07 billion. Exports to the US alone rose 9 percent in the same period, hitting $1.96 billion.

The Garment Manufacturers Association in Cambodia (GMAC), which represents hundreds of companies, has largely taken a backseat to the government in trying to end the dispute. At the beginning of the strike, the association advised member factories to close down to avoid violent altercations. Some remain open, and not all of the more than 400,000 workers employed in the industry have walked off the job.

There was no immediate comment regarding today’s clashes, though yesterday, GMAC said it wouldn’t be attending any discussions due to the tensions.

Khieu Savuth, an official at the Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training, defends the wage deal, saying any more would send buyers to other countries, hurting Cambodia’s largest industry. Garment manufacturing accounts for about 80 percent of Cambodia’s exports, and it’s also the largest manufacturing employer. Garment industry jobs are coveted, particularly for rural Cambodians, in a country where most of the populace scrapes by on subsistence wages, farming, or transporting cheap consumer goods from one town to another for resale. 

“$95 is enough for workers to make a proper living, and they can earn around $150 to $160 per month, including bonus and overtime money,” Mr. Savuth says.

Chea Mony, the head of the Free Trade Union, one of several prominent organizations representing garment workers, says officials are being unrealistic.

“If it is enough, go to work like them, spend the money, and show me,” Mr. Mony says. “If it is enough, all the workers will accept their salary. If not, the government has to give more than that.”

According to the International Labour Organization, Cambodia’s minimum wage is lower than other manufacturing countries, such as Thailand ($243), the Philippines ($148), and Malaysia ($247), though higher than in Myanmar ($57) and Bangladesh ($72).

The political opposition, which has long been marginalized by Hun Sen and the ruling Cambodian People’s Party, has sought to rally workers to its cause by making wage increases part of its campaign platform. On Dec. 29, striking workers joining opposition demonstrators and others in one of the country’s largest mass demonstrations in years.

Social vs. economic

For many garment workers, however, politics take a backseat to more pressing day-to-day concerns, like keeping on the lights. The government decision to enforce import duties, part of a post-election reform meant to stamp out corruption among customs officers, led to the increase in consumer prices in many places.

Maordy, who comes from a province about 50 miles west of Phnom Penh, rents a small apartment near the factory, sharing the $50 monthly rent with a roommate. Electricity runs around $20 a month. She gets some help from her husband, who works construction.

Since the government’s decision on imports and pay hikes, Maordy, who works about eight hours a day, sometimes six days a week, has struggled to keep up. Her landlord increased her rent $5 when word of the wage increase got out.

Experts say the dispute is more nuanced than either the unions or manufacturers care to admit. Many point out that raising wages won’t necessarily scare off buyers, who look at a variety of issues when deciding to source from a country. There is also infrastructure, quality of garments, and workplace safety, an increasingly important concern since a factory collapse in Bangladesh eight months ago killed more than 1,100 people.

“There is a set of issues that are more social, and other types of issues that are more related to the economies,” says Maurizio Bussi, at the International Labour Organization’s office for Thailand, Cambodia, and Laos.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.