Indian diplomat's arrest in NY sparks anger back home. But what about the nanny?

India revoked special privileges for US diplomats today in retaliation for its own diplomat's arrest for paying her nanny $3 an hour.

Indian police remove barricades that had been erected as a safety measure outside the main entrance of the US Embassy, reportedly in retaliation to the alleged mistreatment of New York-based Indian diplomat Devyani Khobragade, in New Delhi, India, Tuesday, Dec. 17, 2013.

India revoked special privileges for US diplomats today as tension mounts over the arrest of an Indian diplomat in New York last week for allegedly underpaying her nanny.

India's Foreign Ministry asked US diplomats to return their identification cards and special airport passes while it conducts a review of their privileges. New Delhi police were also seen removing protective traffic barricades from outside the US Embassy, and top Indian officials cancelled meetings with a visiting US congressional delegation.

Reaction in India has focused heavily on the perceived mistreatment of the Indian diplomat – who was arrested while dropping her daughter off at school – rather than any mistreatment of the nanny, who has been charged in an Indian court for extortion and conspiracy, according to local media reports. But some Indian activists are using this moment to call for greater protection for India’s domestic servants.

Devyani Khobragade, deputy consul general at the Indian consulate in New York, was arrested last Thursday on charges of underpaying her nanny and submitting fraudulent visa paperwork, according to the US district attorney’s office in Manhattan.

Ms. Khobragade said she would pay her nanny $4,500 a month, in accordance with US labor laws, in her visa application, but actually paid the nanny $573.07 a month, according to the district attorney’s office. If found guilty, Khobragade faces a maximum sentence of 10 years for visa fraud and five years for making false statements. [Editor's note: The original version of this story misstated US minimum wage requirements.]

Indians have objected in particular to the treatment of Khobragade, who was handcuffed in public and – as was widely reported in the Indian media – allegedly strip-searched and held in a cell with offenders charged with drug abuse.

"The U.S. may be technically right in what it is doing but it is not diplomatic. Besides rules and regulations, there are also conventions that makes things run. At times the Americans tend to be too self-righteous," says foreign policy commentator Manoj Joshi, a fellow at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi. 

Diplomatic immunity

The United States and India are sparring over whether diplomatic immunity under the Vienna convention applies in this case. 

"Our diplomatic security folks followed our standard procedures, a US State Department spokesman told reporters Monday, saying that the Indian diplomat enjoys immunity only for acts performed in exercise of her consular duties. 

Indian diplomats maintain that Khobragade’s private employment decisions fall under diplomatic immunity.

This is not the first time that an Indian diplomat in the US has been charged with mistreating domestic helpers. In 2011, a former housekeeper sued India's then consul general in New York, Prabhu Dayal, accusing him of intimidating her into a year of forced labor. That case was settled out of court.

In 2012, an Indian maid won a $1.5 million lawsuit against Neena Malhotra, a former press and culture counselor at the New York Consulate, for what a US court determined was "barbaric treatment" tantamount to slavery, but the Indian diplomat has refused to pay the amount, a position supported by an Indian court.

Former Indian Foreign Minister Yashwant Sinha has raised eyebrows by suggesting that in response to Khobragade's arrest, India should arrest same-sex partners of US diplomats in India in light of an Indian Supreme Court ruling last week criminalizing homosexuality. 

“Diplomatic immunity works on the principle of reciprocity. If the US is going to assert local laws over diplomatic immunity, it can't expect India to not do the same,” says retired Indian diplomat Jayant Prasad.

Domestic help

But in India the dispute has also brought attention to how Indians treat domestic help. "If an Indian diplomat cannot afford domestic help why must she have one even at the cost of violating U.S. law? Where does this sense of entitlement to domestic labor come from?" asks Ananya Bhattacharjee, president of a union of domestic workers in Haryana near Delhi.  

Reports of torture and confinement of domestic workers are not rare in India. Just last month, a lawmaker's wife allegedly beat to death their house-help with a hot iron rod. The lawmaker and his wife are both being prosecuted. 

Activists say the slave-like treatment of domestic labor, mostly young women, is not only on account of their poverty but also their caste. Although the Indian constitution abolished the caste system, social divisions persist. Domestic helpers are usually from the lower castes, and are considered as being born for labor. In this case, however, Khobragade is herself from a Dalit or formerly "untouchable" caste.  

In most Indian states, domestic workers are not protected by a minimum wage law, and a proposed federal law to protect domestic workers has not made much progress. 

The International Labour Organization (ILO) estimates that domestic workers account for 3.5 - 12 percent of the working population in developing countries, compared to less than 1 percent in wealthy countries. Estimates for the number of domestic workers in India vary widely, ranging from 2.5 million to 90 million, according to the ILO. The National Platform for Domestic Workers estimates the number at 50 million, roughly 4 percent of the total population.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Indian diplomat's arrest in NY sparks anger back home. But what about the nanny?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today