Indian execution sparks protests, accusations of politics

India today executed Mohammad Afzal Guru, a convict in the 2001 terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament. 

Mohsin Raza/Reuters
Supporters of the Jamaat-ud-Dawa Islamic organization shout slogans during an anti-India demonstration to condemn the hanging of Mohammad Afzal Guru, in Lahore February 9. India hanged the Kashmiri militant on Saturday for an attack on the country's parliament in 2001, sparking clashes in Kashmir between hundreds of protesters and police who wielded batons and fired teargas to disperse the crowds.

India today executed Mohammad Afzal Guru, a convict in the 2001 terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament. Carrying out the death sentence, handed down in 2002 and upheld by the Supreme Court of India in 2005, was a major demand of India's main opposition party, the right-wing Bhartiya Janata Party.

The execution came less than three months after India executed Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving terrorist in the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Like Kasab, the decision to execute Mr. Afzal Guru was not announced in advance. Neither his family nor his lawyer were informed before he was hanged at 8 am in Delhi's Tihar jail. His body has been buried on the jail premises; the family has asked for the body.

“It is an egregious violation of due process and deliberate thwarting of access to justice,” says lawyer and anti-death penalty campaigner Yug Mohit Chaudhry. "The secret, shameful, and surreptitious manner is most unbecoming of a democracy.”

India’s home secretary R.K. Singh told a press conference that due process was followed: “The President rejected Afzal Guru's mercy petition on February 3. After that, we followed the jail manual and his hanging took place today.”

The execution is being seen by analysts as the ruling Congress party’s way of regaining public confidence in the wake of several corruption scandals and protests over the recent Delhi gang-rape. Political commentator Seema Mustafa says the sudden decision to execute Afzal Guru, after years of dilly-dallying, is part of a Congress party effort to improve its position for the 2014 general elections. “The Congress in its usual cynical manipulation of the votes is trying to eat into the majority constituency with this action,” she says.

Executions had become more rare up until Kasab's – the first in India in eight years. Like Kasab's hanging in November, Azfal Guru's came just ahead of a parliament session. “I would just say it's extremely tragic if Indian democracy is going to survive on executing someone or the other before every Parliament session,” says lawyer Vrinda Grover. Congress party spokesman Abhishek Manu Singhvi called such suggestions about the timing "irresponsible and childish."

Another Congress spokesperson, Rashid Alvi, cast the decision as a tough message to would-be terrorists. "We have sent the message to the world that we cannot tolerate terrorism at any cost. If someone tries to commit [an act of terror], he will be punished. The people of our country and the government have zero tolerance against terrorism.”

The Information and Broadcasting Minister Manish Tewari also addressed the media emphasizing that "Congress [is] not soft on terror" and added that "national security decisions [are] not influenced by political considerations."

The five militants who carried out the Parliament raid died in the attack, after they had killed five policemen, a security guard, and a gardener. 

Azfal Guru had earlier been a guerrilla militant in the effort to end Indian control over Kashmir, but had surrendered to Indian security forces long before the Parliament attack. India blamed the incident on Pakistan-based militant groups active in Kashmir and convicted Azfal Guru of helping plan it.

Azfal Guru had maintained that he was framed, and he protested that he was not given a lawyer of his own choice. In his confessional statement in the trial court, Azfal Guru had said that he had been asked to look after six men by the Jammu and Kashmir Police's Special Task Force, and that is all he did, and was now being implicated for it.

While the execution was welcomed by political parties, some of which celebrated it on the streets, a group of protesters in Delhi was attacked by the police with batons. Twenty-one of them were arrested. Protests rocked the Kashmir Valley despite a curfew; 40 were injured. Kashmiri leaders who seek to free the Valley from Indian control have called for a three-day strike.

In Delhi, the police detained Kashmiri academic S.A.R. Geelani, himself an acquitted accused in the Parliament attack case, after he appeared on television channels condemning the execution. Mr. Geelani is also the working president of the Committee for the Release of Political Prisoners, which in a statement described the hanging as illegal: “Afzal’s wife Tabassum had filed a clemency petition demanding justice for her husband who never throughout the trial got an opportunity to defend himself and demand justice.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to