Five women shot dead in Pakistan for fighting polio

Five female health workers vaccinating children against polio have been shot dead in Pakistan as Islamic militants raise suspicions about immunization efforts.

Athar Hussain/Reuters
Pakistani Rangers soldiers walk past a woman after the body of Nasima Bibi, a female worker of an anti-polio drive campaign who was shot by gunmen, arrived at a hospital morgue in Karachi December 18. Gunmen shot five health workers on the anti-polio drive in a string of attacks in Pakistan on Tuesday, officials said, raising fears for the safety of workers immunizing children against the crippling disease.

Five female health workers involved in Pakistan's polio eradication efforts were gunned down Tuesday in two of the country's main cities amid militant resistance to immunization campaigns.

Unidentified gunmen killed four of the women in Karachi and a fifth in Peshawar. Two male volunteers were also injured in Tuesday's attacks, according to Sindh's health department. As a result, an ongoing polio vaccination campaign has been suspended throughout Sindh Province, according to the department. 

Tuesday’s violence highlights a new trend of deadly attacks targeting women, who had previously been avoided unless they were members of religious minorities, says Jameel Yusuf, the former head of Karachi’s Citizens-Police Liaison Committee.

“This calls for serious measures. It is now time for clerics to come out openly. They seem more scared of terrorists than anyone else,” he says by phone. “It is a national issue, in which the health of the people, the children – our future generation – is at stake.” 

Attacks on volunteers and health personnel working on polio vaccinations have increased sharply in 2012. While the motives for the attacks remain unclear, popular suspicion about polio vaccination drives surged after it was revealed that the CIA set up a face vaccination drive in Abbottabad as part of its hunt for Osama bin Laden

Additionally, opponents of polio immunization, including Maulana Fazlullah, the militant leader in Swat, have derided it as a campaign to “make Muslims sterile.” The pushback on polio shots has led to attacks on campaign volunteers even as the number of infections is rising.  

But the attacks also point to a larger issue in Pakistan: the basic failure of the state to protect its citizens. According to the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, more than 1,800 people were killed in targeted attacks in Karachi, Pakistan’s financial capital, in the first 10 months of 2012. And attacks and targeted assassinations by militant groups are common throughout the country.

The polio eradication efforts are a focal point for the violence.

In July, a volunteer was killed in an attack in Karachi. Gunmen also fired at a United Nations vehicle in July, injuring a doctor working on the campaign. A local newspaper reported that communication officers working on the polio campaign refused to work in at least one area of Karachi unless their security was guaranteed.

Mr. Yusuf, who played a key role in developing police reforms and in assisting investigations such as that of the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl’s assassination, says a three-pronged strategy involving clerics, the police, and local administrators is needed to ensure that the campaign goes ahead.

Yusuf said it should be made mandatory for clerics to use the loudspeakers installed at mosques “for the welfare of the people,” to combat the idea propagated commonly in Pakistan that “polio vaccination has something to do with family planning.” “They should speak out that this [misconception] is illegal, wrong, and against the sharia [Islamic law].”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Five women shot dead in Pakistan for fighting polio
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today