Assault on Kabul: Taliban claim attacks as show of strength

Teams of insurgents struck within Kabul and three other cities in coordinated attacks on Sunday. A Taliban spokesman called it the opening of their spring offensive.

Pajhwok News Agency
Smoke rises from the scene of an attack near the Afghan parliament in Kabul, one of a series of coordinate attacks on Sunday by the Taliban.

Teams of insurgents struck within Kabul and three other cities in coordinated attacks on Sunday in what Taliban are calling the insurgency's opening salvos of the spring fighting season. 

“Some days back the Secretary General of NATO [Anders Fogh Rasmussen] on his visit to Kabul said that the Taliban are not strong enough now,” Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban’s main spokesman, told the Monitor in a phone interview from an undisclosed location. “This was a clear message to him to show how strong we are, and they did not put serious attention to Afghanistan issue."

Fighters commandeered buildings near to the parliament and key foreign embassies, sending heavy gunfire and explosions into some of the most sensitive regions of the capital. Full casualty reports are still pending, but the Ministry of Interior says that five people have been wounded thus far in the Kabul attacks. The Afghan Ministry of Defense, meanwhile, says that its security forces have surrounded all the groups of Taliban fighters and brought the situation under control. 

The value of the Sunday Taliban attacks is more symbolic than strategic. Afghan security forces appeared to contain the situation without calling in for assistance from the American-led International Security and Assistance Force (ISAF). But by deploying small numbers of fighters to a variety of locations in Kabul’s diplomatic quarter, the Taliban has played to its own strength – of creating a sense of insecurity among the Afghan population, and generating headlines that will embarrass both the Afghan government and its Western backers.

The attacks come as the Afghan government and its Western backers signalled, again, their willingness to pursue negotiations with the Taliban. On Saturday, Salahuddin Rabbani was appointed to head Afghanistan's High Peace Council, a post left vacant by the assassination of his father. Spectacular attacks, including Burhanuddin Rabbani's assassination, have pushed talks to the breaking point several times before. It remains unclear if today's attacks were designed as another spoiler for negotiations. 

“There is the possibility of fighting and considering talking at the same time, and I don’t think that this attack is a rejection of talks,” says Martine van Bijlert, co-director of the Afghanistan Analysts Network in Kabul. “It takes a long time to prepare an attack like this. I think the Taliban want to start the fighting season with a bang, and this is it.”

“It’s specifically designed for grabbing headlines, without actually carrying out a fullout attack on these high profile targets,” says Ms. van Bijlert. “The key is for them to get into these abandoned buildings that are strategically placed, and start shooting, and create the impression that they are attacking.”

There are reports that several more attackers were intercepted on the way to locations, she adds, but in the meantime, these attacks tend to “close down the city.” For a group like the Taliban, which operates as a guerrilla group, with relatively light weaponry carried by individuals – rifles, rocket propelled grenade launchers, perhaps mortars – the Sunday afternoon attacks are perfectly suited for “giving the impression that Kabul is under attack,” says van Bijlert. “With limited means, you can project something larger than you are actually capable of doing.”

Fighting started near luxury hotel

In Kabul itself, Taliban teams started with a building near the new Kabul Star Hotel – a luxury hotel being built within the highly secure VIP area within central Kabul. Several embassies are within firing distance from the hotel, including those of Iran, India, Germany, Turkey, China, Japan, Britain, and France. Also within firing range are the US military’s Camp Eggers and the ISAF headquarters.

Simultaneously, Taliban gunmen snuck inside the Afghan Milli Bank branch near Parliament on the west side of Kabul. There are no reports of casualties, but several members of parliament took up weapons and fired back on the militants from parliament, according to parliamentarian Mohammad Naeem Lalai.

A third attack in Kabul took place against NATO’s military base in the eastern part of Kabul, along the road heading east to Jalalabad.

In Jalalabad, at the gate to the city's airport – where US troops are based – there are reports of a suicide attack. And Taliban gunmen are also reported to have attacked the governor’s house in Pul-e Alam, the capital of Logar Province, which borders Kabul Province to the south. Fighting is also reported in the capital of the southeastern province of Paktia

In an emailed statement, the Ministry of Interior says its forces identified and intercepted a car carrying explosives. “During the fight a [Toyota van] full of explosives was driving on the Darul Aman road and was recognized by the security personnel and was blown up,” the ministry statement says.

Residents losing faith in security

Mohammad Rahim, a shopkeeper on Kabul’s Butcher Street, says he can’t understand how the Taliban were able to mount such an attack in Kabul itself.

"There is military and police everywhere on the streets of Kabul, they check cars coming to Kabul from provinces, but still these kind of massive attacks happen,” Mr. Rahim says. “It means that even the security people are helping them [the Taliban] or the police personnel are lazy in their jobs."

He says he has lost faith in the government and foreign forces to bring security in the country.

"Everyone in the leadership is just busy with corruption, foreigners are corrupt too. Just poor people are suffering because of insecurity and poverty,” he says. “See how many poor and those people who work on streets would be killed today? I believe there will be a lot." 

Chargul, a money changer, was standing along the road near the Iranian embassy when he heard the sound of gunfire near Charahe Zanbaq and 17th street of Kabul's upscale Wazir Akbar Khan neighborhood.

"After the shooting there was a big blast at first minute and then huge firing started,” says Chargul, who uses only one name. “People just started to run to safe areas. All I could see was just some dust in the air." 

Chargul thinks that a coordinated attack like the one that happened today is too complex for an ill-educated group of gunmen like the Taliban.

"Taliban originally came from madrasas [the religious seminaries],” he says. “They have no idea about fighting. It is Pakistan who trains them and gives them plans for attacks." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.