Young farmers bring new vision to Thailand's forests

In Thailand, a small but growing back-to-the-land movement is drawing young people away from cities to take up farming. In the region of Mae Tha, residents won land lease rights in a protected forest, which is boosting conservation and jobs.

Soe Zeya Tun/Reuters
A farmer looks around his maize field that was destroyed by insects in a district in Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand, June 12, 2019. Many locals who left rural areas for the city are now returning to their roots.

Like many locals, Matthana Abhaimoon left rural Thailand to study in the city. Unlike most, she chose to come back – and fight for her right to farm in the forest as her forefathers had done.

After a 20-year campaign, residents of Mae Tha won a community forest title for their cluster of seven villages, joining a small but growing back-to-the-land movement that is luring young, eco-friendly farmers away from the city.

Under the order, she and about 5,000 villagers can farm some 3,500 acres inside a protected forest in Mae Tha district, a mountainous region in northern Thailand which lies close to the region’s biggest city of Chiang Mai.

It is no small victory in a country rife with old disputes over who has rights to land and its natural resources.

“Young people have new ideas about the environment, sustainability, and food security, and they want to contribute. So they are also involved in the decision making,” Ms. Abhaimoon told the Thomson Reuters Foundation at Mae Tha community centre.

Residents and researchers say the title, with a 30-year lease ending 2045 – when it may be reviewed for extension – has already boosted conservation and jobs.

It has also encouraged more youngsters to stay put and embrace farming rather than run to the city.

“During the coronavirus, many young people who were in the city either lost their jobs or were afraid to stay on, and they moved back to the village and started farming,” said Ms. Abhaimoon a youth community leader.

“It shows this can be a feasible option.”

Into the forest

About 20,000 villages and communities in Thailand are either partially or wholly situated within forest areas, according to government data.

The nation’s community forests – where local residents make decisions about land use and management collectively – benefit about 3 million people, authorities say.

The Community Forest Bill of 2007 had sparked hopes of giving rights to forest-dependent communities, but authorities were slow to issue titles, according to land rights groups.

A Community Forestry Bill introduced in 2019 aimed to give villagers more say in managing resources, but has limited these rights for a fixed period of time and does not give ownership.

“Conservationists don’t trust communities to take care of the forest, and authorities think giving a title will increase encroachments,” said Chayan Vaddhanaphuti, director of the Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development, a research organization in Chiang Mai.

“So while there is a law, it is not being implemented, even though local communities can be a resource in helping prevent wildlife poaching, and illegal logging, and the spread of wildfires,” he said.

Authorities have pledged to resolve conflicts and issue more community land and forestry titles where feasible.

Common language

Rights to forest land are contentious worldwide, with indigenous and local communities from Brazil to India pitted against government officials and hardline conservationists.

About 2 billion indigenous and rural people live in conservation areas worldwide, according to Rights and Resources Institute, a Washington D.C.-based advocacy group.

But while indigenous and local communities own more than half of all land under customary rights, they only have secure legal rights to about 10%, estimates RRI.

The Thai forest reclamation order, enforced by a military leadership in 2014, aimed to end encroachments and conserve natural resources. The government also vowed to increase forest cover to 40% of total land area from about a third.

That goal threatens hundreds of thousands of people living in or near forests, with thousands jailed every year for trespassing, according to rights group Land Watch.

Against this backdrop, residents of Mae Tha sought the help of academics and architects to draw up a land-use plan to protect both natural resources and livelihoods.

They mapped existing land use and future proofed it, tallying water consumption and the risk of natural disasters, as well as forming committees to oversee conservation and record data.

“The participatory process enabled government officials and local communities to find a common language to speak to each other with data and agree on goals,” said Supawut Boonmahathanakorn, an architect who helped draft the plan.

Organic cafe

Forests in Thailand have long been contested sites between the government, corporations, indigenous people, and farmers.

The Mae Tha community says their ancestors settled in the area more than 300 years ago, foraging for bamboo and mushrooms, and felling trees to build homes.

Decades of logging by authorities led to deforestation, and Mae Tha residents were sometimes arrested for trespassing.

Since the title was granted, residents record their use of forest resources including timber – allowed in a designated area – and the area is now lush green.

The Mae Tha Agricultural Cooperative encourages organic farming of vegetables, fruit, corn, and herbs. Government funds mean better irrigation systems and a store for their produce.

“The title has given us confidence to use the land in a more efficient manner, and gives us power to make decisions to solve problems and decide what is best for us,” said Sawad Subajan, a village committee leader.

“We have shown it is possible to preserve the forest while also ensuring development for the community – they can go hand in hand,” he said.

A group of more than 20 young residents is pushing for 100% organic farming, and set up home delivery of their produce in the pandemic – a system now being expanded.

A tie-up with a big retail network has ensured demand for their organic produce, and their new organic cafe is thriving.

“The young people have ideas to promote Mae Tha – they feel more ownership, and have more of a role in the community now,” said Ms. Abhaimoon, as she walked past the chic and bustling cafe.

“I hope they will stay back – we have enough land, water, and food for everyone if we do this in a sustainable manner.”

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.