Is gardening a crime? City dwellers in Malaysia say no.

In the capital of Malaysia, residents have been carving out space in the urban landscape for community gardens. Despite government-issued eviction notices, community members are staying rooted, saying it’s time for the laws to change to make urban farming easier.

Lim Huey Teng/Reuters
High rises stretch out over the skyline in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia on Jan. 13, 2021. In a city where space is limited, community gardens provide access to land that some can not afford otherwise.

Amid the high rises that tower over the Malaysian capital, tiny community gardens are taking shape in a trend that has seen urban dwellers staking claims to the city – one plot at a time.

Using pockets of overgrown land under power lines or slivers sitting idle by the river, community gardeners are busy digging, hoeing, and weeding in a city that is better known for its glitzy shopping malls and testing traffic jams.

But they face threats of eviction and legal uncertainty, highlighting the barriers to community land access and fueling calls for authorities to loosen rules governing urban farming.

“We are not committing any crimes,” said Ng Sek San, a landscape architect who founded Kebun-kebun Bangsar, a community garden in an affluent part of the capital that has been running since 2017.

The garden, on a plot of land under pylons, draws a steady crowd of visitors and volunteers on weekends seeking respite from stifling city life, but last year it was issued with an eviction order after the authorities withdrew a temporary lease.

“We need to ... question discretion, when the law is unjust or not updated for our current city living,” said Mr. Ng, who continues to run the garden despite risking five years in jail and a 500,000-ringgit ($121,000) fine, if the order is enforced.

Other gardens that struggled to secure approvals have also called for legal reforms, to make land access easier for community use, especially in space-starved cities.

Community gardens sprout and grow

Worldwide, many cities have embraced urban farming to grow food locally and foster community, but residents say access to land is often hampered by high costs and stiff competition.

More than two thirds of the world’s population is forecast to live in cities by 2050, according to the United Nations.

The U.N.’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) promotes urban farming as a way to ensure food security amid rapid urbanization, while in fast-aging countries like Singapore, it is also used to tackle loneliness among the elderly.

Urban farming dates back to World War I in many countries, a time when people grew food at home or on public land to avoid food shortages in a trend that continued into World War II.

Home-grown fruit and vegetables are common in rural Malaysia but urban farming only took off in recent years, with some local councils endorsing it to promote sustainable living.

With a population of about 7 million, the greater Kuala Lumpur area has seen at least eight community-led gardens launch in as many years.

Community gardens bolster a sense of belonging for often fragmented city communities, said Lee Jia Ping, a co-founder at Tempatico, a consultancy on urban rejuvenation.

“Cities can be very, very isolating,” said Ms. Lee.

“What’s so good about these community gardens is they are open to anyone. You need spaces where it is open ended, and not only accessible to those who can afford it.”

Most of the community gardens tap into government “reserve land” – unused land near power lines, riverbanks, or train tracks deemed unsuitable for development projects – for farming.

It has not been easy, however.

Under current rules, urban farming projects need a temporary occupation license before they break ground, according to the Federal Territories Lands and Mines Office.

It ordered the eviction of Kebun-kebun Bangsar because it is “occupying government land without valid permission” and after locals complained of noise, the government agency said in a statement to the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

It did not reply to a query on the size of land approved for urban farming in the capital or on pending applications.

The government has recognized the need for an overhaul and even promised new guidelines to help facilitate urban farming.

Those guidelines were due last year but the ministry in charge said it was “unable to provide any answers” about their whereabouts while it awaits a cabinet decision.

Rogue gardeners

Without news on reform, Malaysian businesswoman Phillipa Yoong and her neighbors just went ahead and started on their garden, pent up as COVID-19 kept them close to home last year.

The group spent weeks last August clearing parts of a 1.5-acre plot that sat idle under power lines, thick with weeds.

Even as the crops – brinjals, ladies’ finger, and herbs – took root, the group had still not won approval to use the land, with the land authorities saying they were gathering views on an application that the community had filed last year.

“It’s empty land being wasted, I don’t like to see waste so why don’t we do something about it,” said Ms. Yoong, the head of Kebun Komuniti Hartamas, a community garden in the Sri Hartamas neighborhood.

“If [the authorities] say ‘go’, we go. Until then we just enjoy the community participation and involvement,” said Ms. Yoong, adding that the project had cemented community ties in the pandemic.

In Kebun-kebun Bangsar – before Malaysia went into lockdown this month – children chased ducks and peacocks as volunteers tended to vegetables, with the produce going to soup kitchens for the poor and Myanmar refugees.

Founder Mr. Ng said he was optimistic of change, given growing pushback from communities against rules they see as unfair.

“Land is an extremely expensive resource in the inner city and a lot of people lack access to it, whether it’s just for a walk in the park or to plant their own food,” he said.

“We need to reclaim back some of our resources in the city.” 

This story was reported by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.