As NATO seeks to prove relevance, Canada offers to lead Iraq mission

Canada offered to lead NATO's new training mission, pledging to provide 250 troops and an unspecified number of military helicopters to help Iraq fight against a future power grab by the Islamic State.

Roman Koksarov/AP
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Justin Trudeau inspects the troops and military weaponry as he visits the Adazi Military Base in Kadaga, Latvia, on July 10, 2018. On July 11, Mr. Trudeau announced that he will deploy 250 troops along with military helicopters to Iraq's military academy to ensure them the protection against a possible Islamic State power grab.

Canada on Wednesday offered to lead NATO's new military training mission in Iraq, as the world's biggest security alliance seeks to prove it remains relevant despite deep trans-Atlantic divisions over trade, Iran, and climate change.

With President Trump lashing out at allies like Canada and Germany for failing to respect their defense spending pledges, NATO is keen to demonstrate at a summit in Brussels that it remains capable of confronting an aggressive Russia and playing a major role the fight against terrorism.

Canada is projected to spend just over 1.2 percent of gross domestic product on defense this year – well below the 2-percent target – but Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said that his country plays a prominent role in NATO missions and is investing heavily in new military equipment.

In a possible attempt to outflank Mr. Trump's demands for money, Mr. Trudeau announced that Canada would lead the Iraq training and military academy building mission for the first year, and stands ready to provide 250 troops and an unspecified number of helicopters.

The mission is part of the 29-member alliance's attempt to help Iraq rebuild and ensure that the Islamic State group can't gain a new foothold there. NATO leaders are expected to announce later Wednesday that they will expand the mission from around a dozen troops currently to several hundred trainers operating out of the capital, Baghdad.

"We have to build that democracy and strengthen it," Trudeau said at a German Marshall Fund event on the sidelines of the two-day summit.

"Those sorts of tangible elements are at the heart of what NATO stands for," he said. "You can try and be a bean counter and look at exactly how much this and how much money that, but the fundamental question is: is what you're doing actually making a difference?"

Over two days, the leaders are also expected to announce that they will continue to help fund the Afghan army. NATO has a 16,000-strong military training effort there, and British Prime Minister Theresa May announced Wednesday that her country would provide 440 more personnel.

"I think that shows when NATO calls, the United Kingdom is one of the first to step up," she told reporters.

In a show of resolve to Russia, the leaders will also rubber-stamp a plan to deploy 30 battalions, 30 air squadrons, and 30 battleships within 30 days in case of crisis and endorse two new command headquarters – in Norfolk, Va., and Ulm, Germany, – to help better move troops and equipment across the Atlantic and through Europe.

Questioned repeatedly about Trump's attacks on European allies and Canada, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg acknowledged the trans-Atlantic differences but refused to say whether the US leader's attacks are damaging the alliance.

"My task is to make sure that we stay together, so if I started to freely reflect on all possibilities, then I would undermine the unity of this alliance," Mr. Stoltenberg said.

"A strong NATO is good for Europe and good for the United States. Two world wars and a Cold War taught us that we are stronger together than apart," he said, adding that the US troop presence in Europe allows Washington to project military power into Asia, the Middle East, and Africa.

This story was reported by The Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.