Ripple effect of #MeToo in China: Beijing professor dismissed over sexual allegations

Inspired by the #MeToo movement in the United States, a former student of Beihang University in Beijing spoke out against her professor. Her actions, in turn, inspired students from more than 50 universities around the country to do the same.

Lucy Nicholson/ Reuters/File
People participate in a #MeToo protest march in Los Angeles, on Nov. 12, 2017. Recently, a former student of Beihang University in Beijing inspired by the momentum of the #MeToo movement, accused her professor of sexual assault.

A professor in China accused of sexually harassing students under his supervision has been removed from teaching posts by a top Beijing university, in a case that has sparked national media coverage and a nascent #MeToo movement in the country.

Beihang University said in a statement on its official Weibo account late on Thursday that an investigation found the professor, Chen Xiaowu, had engaged in "sexual harassment behavior" that seriously violated professional ethics and the school's code of conduct.

The Beijing Youth Daily had previously reported Mr. Chen saying he had done "nothing illegal," but Reuters was unable to reach him for comment as the university declined to provide Chen's telephone number and said he was refusing interviews.

The university's investigation was launched after former Beihang student Luo Xixi publicly accused Chen of sexually harassing her 13 years ago in an online blog that promptly went viral after it was posted on Jan. 1.

In the post, Ms. Luo said Chen made an unwanted sexual advance after luring her to his sister's house, and that he only relented after she burst into tears and said she was a virgin. Luo also accused Chen of harassing several other students.

Luo, who now lives in the United States, said she was inspired by the #MeToo social media movement that started in October in the wake of sexual misconduct allegations in the US entertainment industry, and encouraged others to come forward and share their own experiences under the hashtag.

Luo did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Chen's dismissal.

Luo's allegations, combined with another public post from a Peking University graduate, have inspired students from more than 50 universities to issue open letters demanding more effective oversight and a reporting system to deal with sexual harassment on their campuses.

But unlike #MeToo in the US, the campaign has mostly been spread by word of mouth and has struggled to gain traction on social media, in part because Chinese internet censors have been swift to take down the open letters.

Instances of campus sexual harassment have surfaced regularly in recent years, but are usually reported in China's state-run media as isolated cases rather than part of a wider systemic problem.

In its statement, Beihang said Chen was removed as vice-president of the university's graduate school and that his credentials as a teacher and post-graduate supervisor were revoked.

Zhang Leilei, a Guangzhou-based women's rights activist involved in the campaign against campus sexual harassment, said the response from Beihang was clear and swift and represented progress.

She said the campaign would continue to raise the issue's profile in the media so that people would become more ready to speak out, as they have through the #MeToo movement.

On Friday, a student from another university in Beijing came forward with accusations of sexual harassment against her professor in an online post, saying she was emboldened by Beihang's handling of Luo's complaint.

"Right now it seems we may be reaching a tipping point on this particular issue," Ms. Zhang told Reuters. "We hope to use it as a window to begin making change."

This story was reported by Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Ripple effect of #MeToo in China: Beijing professor dismissed over sexual allegations
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today