South Korea: 2015 'comfort women' deal was flawed

A South Korean panel set up to investigate the deal concluded that it failed to meet the needs of the thousands of girls and women forced to work in Japan's military brothels.

Jung Yeon-Je/Pool/Reuters
South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-Wha speaks before a briefing of a special task force for investigating the 2015 South Korea-Japan agreement over South Korea's "comfort women" issue at the Foreign Ministry in Seoul on December 27, 2017.

South Korean President Moon Jae-in said on Thursday that a 2015 agreement with Japan over South Korean "comfort women" forced to work in wartime brothels was seriously flawed after Japan said any attempt to revise it could damage relations.

A South Korean panel set up to investigate the deal concluded on Wednesday that it failed to meet the needs of the thousands of girls and women forced to work in Japan's military brothels, many of them Korean, euphemistically termed "comfort women" by Japan.

The announcement threw ties into doubt as both countries, important US allies, seek to rein in North Korea's nuclear and missile programs.

"The agreement cannot solve the comfort women issue," Moon said, calling the deal a "political agreement that excludes victims and the public" and violates general principles in international society, according to a statement issued by his office.

A Japanese foreign ministry spokeswoman said Japan had conveyed its position to South Korea through diplomatic channels following Moon's remarks, reiterating Foreign Minister Taro Kono's comment on Wednesday that any attempt to change the deal would be "unacceptable" and make relations "unmanageable."

Japan's Kyodo news agency quoted an unnamed Japanese government source as saying it had now become difficult for Prime Minister Shinzo Abe to visit South Korea in time for the Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang in February, in a potential sign of chilling ties.

Four years ago, Abe took a trip to Russia's Black Sea resort of Sochi to attend the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympic Games there and held talks with President Vladimir Putin.

Asked if Moon meant to declare the deal null and void, Park Soo-hyun, a spokesman for the presidential Blue House, said it was "inappropriate" for him to use that term at this point, adding the government would present its "final position."

Under the 2015 deal, Japan apologized to victims and provided 1 billion yen ($8.8 million) to a fund to help them.

The two governments had agreed the issue would be "irreversibly resolved" if both fulfilled their obligations.

Moon pledged to normalize relations and work toward "future-oriented cooperation" with Japan.

Japan's Nikkei business daily on Thursday quoted Abe as telling people close to him that the agreement "will not be changed by even one millimeter."

"Regardless of the Japanese government's stance, we take the investigation results seriously and humbly," South Korean foreign ministry spokesman Roh Kyu-deok told a news briefing, adding Seoul would formulate follow-up measures as soon as possible that could help the victims "regain honor and heal the wounds in their hearts."

Sensitive legacy

Japan and South Korea, which share a bitter history including Japanese colonization, are key to international efforts to rein in North Korea's nuclear and missile programs that it pursues in defiance of UN Security Council resolutions.

The comfort women issue has regularly been a source of rancor between Japan and neighbors China and North and South Korea. Japan colonized the Korean peninsula between 1910 and 1945 and occupied parts of China before and during the war.

The legacy of colonial rule, especially the comfort women issue, remains highly sensitive in South Korea, while in Japan, some ultra-conservatives deny that the women were forced to work in brothels at all.

In 2014, the UN Human Rights Committee asked Japan to clarify the "comfort women" euphemism, with an independent expert on the panel calling for it to be replaced by "enforced sex slaves."

The liberal Moon came to power in May winning a snap election called after the removal of his disgraced predecessor, Park Geun-hye, whose conservative government was criticized for failing to fully consult victims ahead of the 2015 settlement.

Moon pledged to renegotiate the agreement while on the campaign trail.

A poll in December last year showed 59 percent of South Koreans thought the deal should be nullified while 25.5 percent supported it.

Park was forced from power this year over a corruption scandal and is now on trial.

(Reporting by Joyce Lee and Hyonhee Shin; Additional reporting by Hyunjoo Jin in Seoul and Linda Sieg, Kiyoshi Takenaka in Tokyo; Editing by Nick Macfie)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to South Korea: 2015 'comfort women' deal was flawed
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today