China bars activists from taking their seats in Hong Kong legislature

In an unusually direct intervention into Hong Kong's politics, China has barred two separatists elected to the city's legislative council from taking office.

Tyrone Siu/Reuters
Pro-independence legislator-elects Baggio Leung (C) and Yau Wai-ching (R) take part during a protest against what they call Beijing's interference over local politics and the rule of law, a day before China's parliament is expected to announce their interpretation of the Basic Law in light of two pro-independence lawmakers' oath-taking controversy in Hong Kong, China, on Sunday.

China's top legislative body issued a ruling Monday that would effectively bar two Hong Kong legislators from taking office, intervening before the island-city's own judicial system has finished considering the case.

The two legally elected lawmakers were initially prevented from assuming their positions when they used anti-China insults during their oath-taking ceremony, and Beijing’s ruling would prevent them from having a second chance at saying their vows. Since Hong Kong was handed back from British rule in 1997, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) has stepped in four times to interpret the Basic Law, the city's mini-constitution. However, this is the first time it has done so in an effort to preempt a case still under consideration in Hong Kong courts.

The move by mainland China is the latest chapter in an ongoing tussle between Beijing and Hong Kongers who worry that the city’s relative autonomy, protected until 2047 under the handover agreement, is already being eroded. Many analysts see this latest effort to contain any pro-independence sentiment as likely to instead fuel those concerns.

“Some people said the ­National People’s Congress should restrain itself from using all its power,” Li Fei, a deputy secretary general of the NPCSC, told reporters, according to the Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post, “but we say that power has to be used, this is our responsibility ... when Hong Kong’s fundamental interest is in jeopardy, and when the baselines of ‘one country, two systems’ are at stake, the NPCSC has to exercise its power.”

Interpretation of the idea of “one country, two systems,” enshrined in the 1997 handover from Britain, lies at the core of the disagreements. Specifically the Basic Law, which provides for judicial independence, appears to some to be under threat.

In advance of Beijing’s anticipated announcement, protests swept through Hong Kong on Sunday night, echoing a pro-democracy movement that brought the city to a standstill for weeks on end in 2014.

"This incident shows us the Basic Law is a handicapped legal document and the so-called mini-constitution can be amended and controlled by the Chinese Communist Party at will," Joshua Wong, one of the leaders of the 2014 protests, told Reuters.

The actions of the two legislators themselves in modifying their oaths were intended to oppose what some regard as meddling by Beijing. They displayed a flag bearing the words “Hong Kong is not China” and spoke of the “Hong Kong nation.”

The ruling of the NPCSC, laying down its opinion as the case was already being heard in Hong Kong’s courts, is likely to be seen by many as a further effort to reduce the city’s autonomy. Yet Beijing walks a fine line, determined to countenance no serious talk of independence lest it encourage other restive regions.

As the state news agency, Xinhua, reported, “the interpretation aims to warn ‘pro-independence’ people that Hong Kong is an indispensable part of China, and ‘Hong Kong independence’ will never happen in any circumstances.”

It is now for Hong Kong’s courts to take into account the words of the NPCSC as they weigh their own decision on the case. But whatever happens in this particular instance, another hurdle looms on Hong Kong’s horizon: next year’s election of the city's chief executive will be overseen by Beijing every step of the way.

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to China bars activists from taking their seats in Hong Kong legislature
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today