Will Philippines really leave UN? Foreign secretary plays down threats

Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte threatened Sunday to withdraw his country from the United Nations after the international body urged an end to extrajudicial killings of suspected drug traffickers.

Noel Celis/Pool/Reuters/File
Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte gestures while delivering a speech during the 115th Police Service Anniversary at the Philippine National Police (PNP) headquarters in Quezon city, metro Manila, Philippines, on Wednesday

The Philippines will not be leaving the United Nations, despite President Rodrigo Duterte's threats to do so, said the country's foreign minister on Monday.

In a press conference one day prior, President Duterte, nicknamed "Duterte Harry" for his tough, crime-busting reputation, defended the extrajudicial killings of more than 500 drug suspects by police and vigilantes in the eight weeks since he was sworn in. 

In response to pressure from the US State Department and two UN human rights experts urging Mr. Duterte to stop the killings, the president said that "maybe we'll just have to decide to separate from the United Nations." 

Since taking office eight weeks ago, more than 4,400 drug suspects have been arrested and more than 500 killed in gun battles with police and vigilantes. Duterte has openly encouraged vigilantism, telling a crowd in June, "Shoot [a drug lord] and I'll give you a medal." As a result, nearly 600,000 people, both drug dealers and addicts, have turned themselves in to authorities for their own safety.  

The Christian Science Monitor's David Iaconangelo reported earlier this month

[T]he president has championed the rise in death toll – up from the 68 suspects killed by police from Jan. 1 through June 15 of this year – as proof of the "success" of his anti-drug campaign, saying in mid-July that "while the campaign against drugs is far from perfect, a generation of Filipinos have been saved from this scourge of society and destroyer of lives," according to AFP.

But human rights and faith groups and the families of many of those killed say that state-sponsored violence...has mainly taken its toll on poor Filipinos who are seldom given the chance to defend themselves from accusations, The New York Times wrote on Tuesday.

Though Duterte's critics are numerous, among Filipinos his trust rating in July was a historically high 91 percent.    

Speaking on Saturday just after midnight, Duterte responded to US officials by implying that their criticism of the Philippines' violence against drug suspects was hypocritical.

"Why are you Americans killing the black people there, shooting them down when they are already on the ground?" he said. "Answer that question, because even if it's just one or two or three, it is still human rights violations."

He also brought up the recent photo of Omran Dagneesh, a 5-year-old Syrian boy whose image went viral last week after an airstrike in the city of Aleppo, asking, "Why is it that United States is not doing anything? I do not read you. Anybody in that stupid body complaining about the stench there of death?" 

If the Philippines were to leave the UN, Duterte said, he would invite China and African countries to join in forming a new intergovernmental organization.

On Monday, Foreign Affairs Secretary Perfecto Yasay clarified that the threats were "a statement expressing profound disappointment and frustration." 

"We are committed to the U.N. despite our numerous frustrations with this international agency," he said. 

This report contains material from Reuters and the Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.