Why Chinese school kids face a treacherous cliff-face commute

Local Chinese authorities said they will build steel stairs after images of rural school children forced to climb down a more that 2,600-foot mountain side to get to class caught international attention.

Children wearing their school backpacks climb on a cliff using a bamboo ladder on their way home from school in Zhaojue county, southwest China's Sichuan province, May 14. The province said the children will get a set of steel stairs after photos of the children when viral online.

To get to school, a group of Chinese school children must clamber more than 2,660 feet down a sheer cliff on makeshift wood-and-vine ladders.

After images of the children scaling the cliff captured by an award-winning Chinese photographer caught national and then international attention, local Chinese authorities promised to take steps to find them a safer route between their homes and school.

The children  come from a remote rural village called Atuler, which sits atop a mountain in southwestern China's Sichuan Province. There is reportedly not enough room to build a school on top of the mountain, so the children have to scramble to one in the valley below.

Seven people have reportedly died already trying to make the same journey, according to The Independent. Because of the dangers involved, the children board at the school and only return home twice a month when their parents can help escort them on the treacherous trip the Guardian reports.

The children, between ages of 6 and 15 years old, come from a 72-family village, whose economy is built around the subsistence farming of potatoes, chili, and walnuts.

According to local reports, some four dozen staff members from Zhaojue county's transport, education, and environment departments arrived in Atuler this week and have since promised to install steel stairs on the mountain face before planning a longer-term solution.

One such solution might take the form of a road to connect the village to the outside world, according to Global Times. However, officials say that would cost around 40 million yuan ($6.1 million) to build, and the Zhaojue county only receives 4 million yuan worth of Chinese government aid for poverty-relief funding.

"Lack of infrastructure seriously limits village development. Even when there's a decent harvest, residents have to transport agricultural products to the market themselves," Zhaojue county office secretary Jike Jinsong told The Beijing News.

The situation, some experts say, shows how many rural poor are being left behind as China rapidly urbanizes and its middle-class grows.

Some local authorities have been less likely to put funds into poverty relief because of the lack of an obvious return on investment, Yu Shaoxiang a social security and poverty relief legislation expert at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences told the Global Times.

However, more than 680 million Chinese have come out of poverty since the country's economic reforms in the 1980s, according to The Guardian.

The photos of the children's cliff-face commute were taken by Chen Jie, a Beijing Times staffer. He told The Guardian via WeChat that he hoped his images would help change Atuler’s "painful reality."

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.