Bill Clinton urges reconciliation in surprise trip to Myanmar

The president who put sanctions on Myanmar is now bringing his global foundation to work in the country.

Khin Maung Win/AP
Former US President Bill Clinton speaks at the Myanmar Peace Centre Thursday, Nov 14, 2013, in Yangon, Myanmar. Clinton met with political leaders in Myanmar to discuss challenges the emerging democracy faces, such as violence against Muslims.

In a surprise visit to Myanmar Thursday, former US President Bill Clinton urged national leaders to defuse the ethnic and religious divisions that have roiled the country, two years into a transition away from military rule.

“The whole world has been pulling for Myanmar, even since you opened up,” Mr. Clinton told a group of political, social, and religious leaders in Yangon, the country’s commercial capital. “The whole world cheers every piece of good news and is sick every time they read about sectarian violence.”

It was the first time in Myanmar for Clinton, who as president presided over the ramp-up in US economic sanctions on the country’s former military junta during the 1990s. It was Clinton’s wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whose visit to Myanmar in 2011 signaled the beginning of the thaw between the two countries after the military junta ceded control to a quasi-civilian government.

Officially, Clinton was in town adding his foundation to the growing list of non-profits setting up shop on the formerly isolated southeast Asian nation. The Clinton Foundation will be working in Myanmar to procure HIV/AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis drugs and will work on drug resistance issues, maternal and child health, and agricultural development, he said.

But Myanmar’s effort to strike a peace accord among the many ethnic regions that have resisted central government control for decades – and the anti-Muslim violence that has spread east from Rakhine state over the past year – were not far from the surface.

After meeting with reformist President Thein Sein and parliamentary Speaker Shwe Mann in the capitol city of Naypyidaw Thursday, Clinton stopped in with opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi in Yangon.

In his speech to civil society leaders, the former president discussed the Brazilian rain forest, Northern Ireland, the human genome, the Rwandan genocide, and his conversations with Yasser Arafat. He focused heavily on how societies riven by conflict or oppression had made peace among themselves by engaging longtime adversaries in debate.

“It’s not enough just to say I won’t be a tyrant.... You have to organize the inclusion of groups that will be [otherwise] left out,” he said. “It’s important to find things you agree on.”

Clinton was noticeably careful with his words when it came to the issue of Buddhist-Muslim violence, which has left hundreds of people – mostly Muslims – dead over the past year. It was perhaps a reflection of the sensitive nature of the issue here, and the awkward position it has put Western governments in as they embrace the new government and encourage their companies to invest here. Tensions are particularly high in Rakhine state, where the displaced Muslim Rohingya community has faced considerable violence and prejudice.

Still, people on different sides of the spectrum applauded Clinton's speech.

“They were very chosen words,” says Khin Maung Myint, a Rohingya advocate and member of the National Democratic Party for Development. “Still, he gave the message.”

“He stressed reconciliation … not vengeance and justice,” says Yin Yin Nwe, a former UN official and Rohingya critic from Shan State, where violence between the central government army and local Shan soldiers still flares occasionally. She noted that even Myanmar’s former political prisoners “are not crying out for vengeance, for justice.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.