Japan's deadlock over? A supermajority emerges in exit polls.

Japan’s main conservative party pulled off a major victory in Sunday’s election, giving its leader, Shinzo Abe, a mandate to push for big public spending and a hawkish foreign policy.

Yuriko Nakao/Reuters
Japan's main opposition Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) leader and former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe smiles, at the LDP headquarters in Tokyo December 16. LDP surged back to power in an election on Sunday just three years after a devastating defeat, giving Abe a chance to push his hawkish security agenda and radical economic recipe.

Japan’s main conservative party pulled off an overwhelming victory in Sunday’s election, giving its leader, Shinzo Abe, a mandate to pursue his hawkish security agenda and abandon the country’s pledge to phase out nuclear power.

The result marked a dramatic comeback for Abe’s Liberal Democratic party (LDP), just three years after it was ousted in a landslide win for the left-of-center Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ).

Exit polls indicated the LDP was on course to win around 300 seats, and its traditional ally, New Komeito, about 30 seats. Combined, that would secure them a two-thirds majority in the 480-seat lower house, enabling them to override attempts to block legislation by the upper house, where no single party has overall control.

That “supermajority” would end the policy deadlock that has restrained Japan for the past five years, as it attempts to end two decades of economic stagnation and address ballooning welfare and pension bills.

Abe to focus on economy

Abe, 58, who resigned as prime minister in 2007 amid ill health and scandals involving his cabinet ministers, signaled he would make the economy his priority. "First and foremost we have to bring about an economic recovery and pull Japan out of deflation," he said on TV after his party’s victory was assured.

The current prime minister, Yoshihiko Noda, whose DPJ is expected to win just 65 seats – about a fifth of the number it won in 2009 – said he would resign as party leader to take responsibility for its heavy defeat.

"The result reflects a public assessment of our three years and three months in power,” Goshi Hosono, the DPJ’s policy chief, said in a TV interview. "The party leadership, including myself, must take responsibility for that.”

Koichi Nakano, a political science professor at Sophia University in Tokyo, says the LDP had benefited from public anger over the DPJ’s broken promises.

“The DPJ’s slogan three years ago was putting people’s livelihoods first, but then Noda increased the consumption tax, and that was seen by voters as a fundamental betrayal,” Nakano says. “The Japanese electorate is consistent in punishing the governing party if it feels it has been lied to.”

Shigeru Ishiba, the LDP’s general secretary, said the new administration’s work would begin immediately. “This is a tremendous result, but we have a whole host of issues confronting us, including the economy and national security. The people have expectations of us, and we have to respond to them quickly."

Rockier China relations?

Abe’s victory could complicate ties with China, with which it is embroiled in a territorial dispute that has harmed trade ties between Asia’s two biggest economies. Known for his hawkish views, he has promised to take a tougher stance towards Beijing over rival claims to the Senkaku islands – known as the Diaoyu in China – and to revise the constitution to give Japan’s military a more prominent role.

A commentary on the website of China's official Xinhua news agency called on the victor in Sunday’s election to repair ties with its neighbors and take a long-term approach to regional stability.

It described as a "troubling sign" that some parties, including Abe’s, have pledged to take a tough line on territorial disputes and boost military spending.

Nakano says Abe’s commanding victory would give momentum to his hawkish security agenda. “During his campaign to lead the LDP, he said he regretted moderating his stance on China the first time he was prime minister,” Nakano says. “This is his last chance, so will he want to go down as someone who moderates his views when in office, or as a conviction politician? My feeling is that he’ll go for the latter."

Big spender

On the economy – the single biggest issue of the campaign – Abe has pledged to return to high spending on public works and ease monetary policy to boost growth.

The election also saw the emergence of a third force in the form of the Japan Restoration party, a far-right group led by the outspoken former governor of Tokyo, Shintaro Ishihara, that was predicted to win around 46 seats.

At one point polls suggested the restoration party could overtake the DPJ as the country’s second-biggest party and act as power broker in a hung parliament. That level of influence now looks unlikely, but LDP officials suggested the new administration could turn to Ishihara for support if it decides to proceed with constitutional reform – a shared ideological goal.

“Our priority is our coalition with New Komeito,” Ishiba said, “Then we’ll think about how to coordinate with other parties, such as the Japan restoration party, especially on security issues.

”The LDP, which governed for all but 11 months between 1955 and 2009, capitalized on popular anger over the DPJ government's failure to deliver on a promise to replace pork-barrel politics with a new focus on families, welfare, and healthcare.

Instead, uncertainty over the economy and Japan's response to the rise of China appears to have sent voters reaching for the familiar – big spending on public works to boost growth, and more emphasis on boosting Japan’s ability to defend its shores.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Japan's deadlock over? A supermajority emerges in exit polls.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today