Drive for education drives South Korean families into the red

Students took the all-important college entrance exam this week. Many households in South Korea are deeply in debt, and analysts point to high family spending on private education as a key culprit. 

Kim Hong-Ji/Reuters
A student studies for South Korea's college entrance exam at an intensive boarding school dedicated to test preparation.

When Cheon Sun-kyoung and her husband took out a $100,000 loan and moved their family of three from the affordable suburbs to one of Seoul’s most affluent neighborhoods, she hoped it would be the start of the climb up South Korea’s highly competitive social ladder.

She wanted to enroll her teenage daughter in one of the pricey after-school tutoring academies here to giver her an edge on getting into a prestigious university and, eventually, landing a high-paying job. But for now, Ms. Cheon says her family has to scrape by.

“It’s really expensive living here, I even have to buy our groceries in another, cheaper neighborhood,” Cheon, a part-time teacher, says. “It’s not possible to save any money now because we are paying off the loan we took out to get this apartment.”

Despite the efforts of the Korean government to rein them in, more and more South Korean families like the Cheons are channeling all of their disposable income into supporting their children’s education – and increasingly driving themselves into debt.

In August, the Bank of Korea released data that shows households here are facing a debt-to-income ratio around 160 percent this year, up from around 123 percent in 2010. Loans taken out from mostly secondary lenders that charge high interest rates total close to $600 billion. As of the end of July, household debt totaled $573.25 billion, according to the Bank of Korea. 

According to the LG Economic Research Institute, 28 percent of South Korean households cannot make payments on their debts each month and can’t cover their monthly expenses with their current income.

For some observers, those figures have set off alarm bells. Just ahead of the US financial crisis in 2008, Americans had a debt-to-income ratio of around 130 percent

According to the Chosun Ilbo, South Korean parents spend an average of $1,000 per child on education each monthSouth Koreans poured $19 billion into private tutoring, cram sessions, and college exam prep in 2009, more than half the sum spent on public education. Some report this spending is the number one reason Koreans are deciding to have fewer children: In 2011, South Koreans spent an estimated $17.7 billion on private education, down for the second year in a row because of Korea's declining birthrate.

Jeong Young-sik is an analyst at the Samsung Economic Research Institute in Seoul.  He estimates that 70 percent of household expenditures go toward private education. Mr. Jeong says that, thanks to a slumping real estate market, a perfect storm has been created.   

“There are myths that contribute to South Korea’s household debt problem. One is the belief that real estate prices will always go up.  Another is that education will increase a family’s social position,” he says.        

This notion of education-based social mobility became cemented into the public consciousness after the Korean War. The nation was left in ruins with few natural resources. The only way for a family to lift itself out of poverty was “human capital.” And that began with ensuring children received the best education available, no matter the sacrifice or cost.   

“Parents still want to educate their children so they can achieve better status,” Jeong says. And parents are increasingly willing to do whatever it takes for their children to do that, even if that means losing status in the short run.

Who is benefiting?

Rising stature is linked to how well a student scores on the South Korean standardized university entrance exam, a multiple-choice test, which was held Nov. 8, this year. Many consider it the most important test of their life. 

After-school and private education in South Korea is centered on preparing students to ace the exam. It’s a multibillion dollar industry that caters to families hoping to send their children to one of the nation’s top four universities. Owners of these private preparatory academies, known in Korean as hagwon, are making huge profits.        

“People want to go to high-ranking universities. They think that the better the school the more successful you will become,” says Kim Dong-young, director of the Highest Hagwon in Seoul. “But the public school system doesn’t provide enough tutoring to do so. This is why families send their kids to these private schools.”  

Kim says that annually, his school brings in around $9 million. 

Not enough slots at colleges

But not all South Korean students who score well on the entrance exam and enroll in top universities go on to achieve great success and pay back their family’s investment. There are fewer slots available than there are students trying to get in, and some observers say Korea’s culture of education-driven mobility is creating an economic backlash.  

“The problem is we have an overeducated working class,” says Jasper Kim, who heads the Asia Pacific Global Research Group. “There are highly qualified people who want to work for a narrow bandwidth of companies, namely the LGs and Samsungs of the world.” 

Kim points out that South Korea’s youth unemployment rate, which stands at about 7 percent, is more than twice the national average. Companies keep raising the bar in order to hire only the most impressive graduates. And the Korean version of “keeping up with the Joneses” is the cause of shame for many young South Koreans.         

“What happens to the rest of the pack who don’t get selected?  For them, it's a real challenge and a real hardship,” Kim says.

Over the edge

Some mental health experts say this pressure to live up to their family’s expectations is pushing some young Koreans over the edge.

“If they are under stress, feel anxious about their exam score and lack a support system, this could make them think about suicide,” says Kim Hyun-chung, a psychiatrist at the National Medical Center in Seoul.  “Suicide is the leading cause of death for young adults.”

The South Korean government is trying to lessen the emotional and economic burden on families that results from this competition. Recently, President Lee Myung-bak encouraged high school graduates to skip college and head straight for the workforce.

Last year, the government opened 21 specialized trade schools as an alternative to university education. The government also initiated tax breaks for companies who hire holders of only a high school diploma.  These measures are also aimed at bringing down Korea’s high youth unemployment numbers.

But government incentives can’t resolve all of Korea’s problems, says Kim Hyun-chung.  The psychiatrist says it will take a generational shift in the way people regard education and employment to make a real difference.  But for now, Koreans need to slow down, she says.

“Everyone is burning out,” she says. “We need to become more self-reflective and take a step back. Everyone is rushing to try to fit in. ”

Ms. Kim adds that Korean mothers can start this by putting less pressure on their children to ace the university entrance exam.

Cheon, the woman who took out a large loan with her husband to give her daughter better opportunities, says her family's move and all the money spent on her education are worth it. Her daughter still has one more year to study before she takes the test, and many hours of private tutoring lie ahead.    

“We're giving her more opportunities,” says Cheon. “For Korean mothers, it’s the most important thing we can do for our children.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Drive for education drives South Korean families into the red
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today